Would running both of them on one of my players be dumb
The only reason to do this is on a safety if you run cover 3 and flip the play from time to time where sometimes he is in the middle of the field and sometimes on the outside 3rd
Rollhumps said:The only reason to do this is on a safety if you run cover 3 and flip the play from time to time where sometimes he is in the middle of the field and sometimes on the outside 3rd
I mainly just run cover 2 so i was just wondering if it would be good if both deep safeties had deep in and deep out
Alex1012591 said:I mainly just run cover 2 so i was just wondering if it would be good if both deep safeties had deep in and deep out
maybe... because they provide quicker reactions and knockouts, but I would imagine it would be easy to scheme your safeties to drift outside and leave the middle open. Not sure. Haven't tried that combination.
Who are your safeties currently? If you want to try the 91 Darren Woodson from last field pass, he has both for a total of 3 AP
Rollhumps said:maybe... because they provide quicker reactions and knockouts, but I would imagine it would be easy to scheme your safeties to drift outside and leave the middle open. Not sure. Haven't tried that combination.
Who are your safeties currently? If you want to try the 91 Darren Woodson from last field pass, he has both for a total of 3 AP
I use a full 60/60 playoff
Rollhumps said:maybe... because they provide quicker reactions and knockouts, but I would imagine it would be easy to scheme your safeties to drift outside and leave the middle open. Not sure. Haven't tried that combination.
Who are your safeties currently? If you want to try the 91 Darren Woodson from last field pass, he has both for a total of 3 AP
So Darnell savage and neal play up top
Alex1012591 said:So Darnell savage and neal play up top
prob best way is gonna be trail and error... I'm on GOM Future 50/50 with Winfield + Jackson and both have Deep In Zone and my CBs (Hester and Moss) have Deep Out