Gameday Player Upgrades!

Last Post
Posts: 1819 |
38
#1

As you know, the Gameday harvest players had in-game NFL goals to meet to be upgraded. Each player had two objectives for their games yesterday, one team and one individual. The player name link is to the 90, and the upgraded OVR link is to the updated stats!

Deshon Elliott (Lions)

  • Team: 1+ Sacks ✅
  • Individual: 7+ Tackles ✅
  • 90 -> 92 OVR

Gabriel Davis (Bills)

  • Team: 17+ PTS ✅
  • Individual: 50 Yards + 1 TD ❌
  • 90 -> 91 OVR

Dorance Armstrong (Cowboys)

  • Team: Hold Giants To Less Than 370 Yards ✅
  • Individual: 1 Sack ✅
  • 90 -> 92 OVR

Daniel Jones (Giants)

  • Team: Rush for 80+ Yards ✅
  • Individual: 2+ TDs ❌
  • 90 -> 91 OVR

Eric Kendricks (Vikings)

  • Team: Hold Patriots to less than 24 pts ❌
  • Individual: 5 Tackles + 1 Pass Deflection ✅
  • 90 -> 91 OVR

Hunter Henry (Patriots)

  • Team: Pass for 200+ Yards ✅
  • Individual: 30 YDS + 1 TD ✅
  • 90 -> 92 OVR

Did you build any of these guys in sets before the games yesterday?

Last edited by rka7731 - , edited 1 time in total.
Reply with quote Send DM Report
Posts: 3122 |
615
#2

Thanks for the write up! I’m actually shocked that EA has these updated already. I picked Deshon Elliott and Gabriel Davis from HR. I’m pleasantly surprised that they gave Deshon +3 SPD and Gabe +2 SPD. They were both playing well before the upgrade so I will definitely keep them in the lineup!

Reply with quote Send DM Report
Posts: 1378 |
5
#3
SlowAndSteady said:

Thanks for the write up! I’m actually shocked that EA has these updated already. I picked Deshon Elliott and Gabriel Davis from HR. I’m pleasantly surprised that they gave Deshon +3 SPD and Gabe +2 SPD. They were both playing well before the upgrade so I will definitely keep them in the lineup!

Have you noticed the low man coverage of Elliot? I was thinking about building him for cheap but 83 man scares me even with a +3 strat card.

Reply with quote Send DM Report
Posts: 3122 |
615
#4
TheChamp22 said:

Have you noticed the low man coverage of Elliot? I was thinking about building him for cheap but 83 man scares me even with a +3 strat card.

I’m on Old Gen and run 99% zone so I can’t give you any feedback on using him in Man. If you are mostly running Man I would be scared of his 83 rating as well.

Reply with quote Send DM Report
Posts: 10298 |
5,551
#5

Yours is much nicer looking than my thread yesterday 😂

Reply with quote Send DM Report
Posts: 1378 |
5
#6
SlowAndSteady said:

I’m on Old Gen and run 99% zone so I can’t give you any feedback on using him in Man. If you are mostly running Man I would be scared of his 83 rating as well.

I run mostly match in my scheme, so it uses both the man and the zone ratings. Usually I want my safeties to hit both 90 man 90 zone with the strat card, but I got Minkah for 200k last night and he plays insane with only 89 man after boosts. His zone hits 95 though so that could be helping a ton. 

I hate the man meta so I don't run any man besides the few times a game I'll blitz with it.

Reply with quote Send DM Report
Posts: 3122 |
615
#7
TheChamp22 said:

I run mostly match in my scheme, so it uses both the man and the zone ratings. Usually I want my safeties to hit both 90 man 90 zone with the strat card, but I got Minkah for 200k last night and he plays insane with only 89 man after boosts. His zone hits 95 though so that could be helping a ton. 

I hate the man meta so I don't run any man besides the few times a game I'll blitz with it.

Yeah that makes sense. I picked up Minkah last night as well but I haven’t had time to play any games yet. Hoping he plays well for me at FS.

Reply with quote Send DM Report
Posts: 1409 |
4,275
#8

they were generous with gabe davis which is a W! wouldve picked him up cuz hes an amazing free option BUT his RR turned me away

Reply with quote Send DM Report
Posts: 1819 |
38
#9
ucwarrior said:

they were generous with gabe davis which is a W! wouldve picked him up cuz hes an amazing free option BUT his RR turned me away

Did you get any of them?

Reply with quote Send DM Report
Posts: 1378 |
5
#10
ucwarrior said:

they were generous with gabe davis which is a W! wouldve picked him up cuz hes an amazing free option BUT his RR turned me away

I built Davis and Kendricks and both have been good so far for me.

Reply with quote Send DM Report
Posts: 1409 |
4,275
#11
rka7731 said:

Did you get any of them?

Nah In the end I chose creed Humphrey and put him at tackle for 1 Ap SP

Reply with quote Send DM Report
Posts: 1819 |
38
#12
ucwarrior said:

Nah In the end I chose creed Humphrey and put him at tackle for 1 Ap SP

Ooh 👀

Reply with quote Send DM Report
Posts: 1409 |
4,275
#13
rka7731 said:

Ooh 👀

Yep him and wirfs give me so much more time to throw the ball against DONs and ETs

Reply with quote Send DM Report
Posts: 46 |
800
#14

I was happy to see my lions got a 92 SS ,but I thought he was only going to get plus one . He only had 5 tackles but I'll take it EA thanks. But my real question is. Why is the one I made for over 200k bnd still. Every year when they get upgrades they can then be sold. LOL @ me, if I made Elliott. N then selected Elliott from HR s for them both to be BND..  Anyone else Allstar not Auctionable yet

Reply with quote Send DM Report
Posts: 562 |
3,031
#15
Beready2cry said:

I was happy to see my lions got a 92 SS ,but I thought he was only going to get plus one . He only had 5 tackles but I'll take it EA thanks. But my real question is. Why is the one I made for over 200k bnd still. Every year when they get upgrades they can then be sold. LOL @ me, if I made Elliott. N then selected Elliott from HR s for them both to be BND..  Anyone else Allstar not Auctionable yet

DeShon Elliott had 8 total tackles (4 solo) that''s why completed the objective.

The cards in both the fantasy pack and set completion were shown as BND, no surprise they remained BND.

Reply with quote Send DM Report
Log in to join the conversation