Is Trent Williams better at FB or TE?

Last Post
Posts: 37 |
65
#1

Just wondering because I have Trent but an outdated TE so what do you guys think should I move Trent to TE and buy a good FB or keep Trent at FB and buy a good TE?

Reply with quote Send DM Report
Posts: 894 |
4,255
#2

Depends on how many subs you want to make, and whether you need his chemistry. I'm about 80/20 run-over-pass, and he doesn't make my team, while Jason Kelce is rostered at long snapper.

Reply with quote Send DM Report
Posts: 5449 |
12.6K
#3

Just depends on your scheme. I think he's better at FB. But it just depends on what you need your TE to do. If your scheme looks to target the TE in the passing game, I would use some coins to upgarde your TE to someone like Kelce or Mackey. But he's perfectly fine at TE if you just need a blocker or don't use your FB often.

Last edited by Breakluna - , edited 2 times in total.
Reply with quote Send DM Report
Posts: 37 |
65
#4

I don't really spam run plays so I'll probably just keep him at FB and get a good TE because I target them often.

Reply with quote Send DM Report
Posts: 248 |
565
#5

I use him as an extra blocking TE2. Helps both pass and run. Also helps kick return game.

Didn’t care for him at FB.

Reply with quote Send DM Report
Log in to join the conversation