von11 said:"Overall this game is just so inconsistent, which prevents it from being a good product."...Truest statement of the year I have read. This is what makes the game "frustrating" at best. Folks used to complain about the "pay to win" teams...heck...you can't even pay to win as there is no consistency. So to answer your original question (well laid out post by the way)...I would only upgrade within reason. Do I think a 99 is better then a 90? Yes...better then a 97? Well...not so much.
Exactly...because the best players have "potential" to play great to match their ratings...but it doesnt mean they well actually play great consistently
.
EA can basically control how players play in game, regardless of ratings.
.
Combine Bo Jackson on certain games can still appear better than the new Walter Payton card
Doug Williams can still make throws the Tribute Brady card misses
Super Bowl Warren Sapp on certain games will get better blockshedding than the new Vince Wilfork
John Runyan will miss blocks that Superbowl Whitworth picked up
Its just so inconsistent