It’s not the people quitting out. It’s the needing stats. they made the games longer, so staying in all those games doesn’t work for people with live. it’s the fact that stats matter more than the actual wins. i only needed to win 7 games this week.everything else was stat chasing that’s the dumb part.
elmango30 said:“you have to play me in madden for as long as I want” is a super weird take
You have room temp IQ
I don't have the game was going get it on sale but what the fuck is this you have to win or the status don't count and ppl just quit out randomly
bbrewer23goblue said:L take.....i earned those stats.....might not earn the W but i still earned those yrds, fgs, tds, etc etc etc
I agree you put in the work, but you didnt earn the points. Aint no way you're encouraging rewarding losses and saying I have the L take 🤣🤣.
frugalhobo said:You have room temp IQ
You’re gonna have to back that up there little buddy
SportsPerson94 said:I was losing 22-3 the other night and i came back and won 38-25. 14-0 isn't an automatic loss with 5 minute quarters. People are just too lazy to try to come back regardless if stats are tracked or not
I hear you. I came back and won today after being down 14-0 quick. It all depends, but I stand by my point. I’ll add “no reason to stay in if winning is very unlikely”.
I just don't get their reasoning. How is not awarding stats for losing gonna keep people from quitting. If they are quitting it's because they are losing and not getting stats anyway lol. Fkn dumb. Now if I'm gonna lose but at least get my stats I might stick it out. Just gonna make people play something else.
kaotikords said:Thats probably the best way to handle it. The more you quit the longer the time out period is as well.
Then you’ll have almost no one to play with since “everyone quits”😹😹😹😹
Keys said:I take it more of a player base of a Millennial's /boomers mentality of "I get a few hours to play each week due to kids/work/responsibilities; not wasting it on an obvious loss."
You honestly believe that someone with limited time to play that is getting crushed with their 80 ovr team vs a sweaty user with 87 legend players and abilities stacked is "building character"? if you are getting smashed then you are literally wasting time staying in that match as losing the game counts none of your stats.
I agree OP the current system not the greatest and I don't at all get offended when a player Im crushing quits.
well if your an 80 ovr team getting matched with a player that has 87 ovr legends. that's on LazyEA for not having their system setup for competitors to be matched correctly. As well as lack of players involved in H2H because of matching players incorrectly. it's a vicious circle
googanaba said:EA is pushing people away from H2H with this. They will be left with a super small market if they can’t attract new people. It’s insane
I can't wait for the day to come when there's other companies bringing out football games. LazyEA is a joke im done spending money in the game. half the time it doesn't if work I can get my Nintendo console from the 80s to work better than this damn game. there's so many damn bugs and glitches. we as players have to find loopholes just to get through challenges ,solo battles Etc it's an absolute garbage company that shows zero interest in their fans wants and needs. atrocious company
I don’t mind there being win only stats so those who spend money and/or sweat every game have an advantage chasing the 1000ltd player reward, but it needs to be inverted from the system they have now. It should be 3 objectives that involve winning and give people 1 point per win. Having so many objectives for win only will push the casual players out and make for a dead mode. They also need to retool the SB rewards, I was done with mine by Saturday and have no reason to touch that mode until Friday.
Karmageddon said:I agree you put in the work, but you didnt earn the points. Aint no way you're encouraging rewarding losses and saying I have the L take 🤣🤣.
stats are diff than wins......man common sense isnt very common here