my whole team is nerfed?

Speaking of mut Champs, why cant I play a game? Every time I try it logs me out

yurugugottadie said:

nah.

i have played the same opponents in the same day, with the same rosters.

when the only variables that differ are:

dropped interceptions

missed blocks

extra points added to the score

ball placed on opposite goal line after touchback

buttons stop working on random plays

dropped open passes

completed passes changed to incomplete

allowintg a player to use field goal block formation to stop pass plays

🧐

thats dda kid.

💤

as a business model:

making it so inferior players can win incentivizes the casual players to continue playing, while buying packs and generating revenue

💰

the algorithm seeks to level out the mass of players, because if only 30% of the players win all the time:

then 70% will quit playing.

this is NOT a football sim: its a casino style arcade game.

🎲

the same way arcade games would cheat in the 80s so you would keep pumping quarters into them.

👾

i have also noticed correlation between win streaks and buying cash packs.

while losses come consistently at thresh holds of a fieldpass reward, bowl game or any other bonus.

🧐

you know its real when an ea drone tries to argue that it doesnt exist.

💤

first off, me disagreeing with you is *not* evidence that you are right. That’s a backwards logic ignoring mentality. 
Anecdote is not the singular of data. Show me data that says DDA exists in EA games or I will continue to believe it is ELO because I have never been given data to believe DDA exists but I have to believe ELO exists. Believing something without data is the true drone behavior 💤💤💤

elmango30 said:

first off, me disagreeing with you is *not* evidence that you are right. That’s a backwards logic ignoring mentality. 
Anecdote is not the singular of data. Show me data that says DDA exists in EA games or I will continue to believe it is ELO because I have never been given data to believe DDA exists but I have to believe ELO exists. Believing something without data is the true drone behavior 💤💤💤

you are confused kid.

i offered a HYPOTHESIS  and THEORY of how and why the game uses DDA.

I offered observed phenomena that has occurred beyond my personal experience. 

🧐

on the other hand, you offered an OPINION that there is no DDA, without a specific HYPOTHESIS and THEORY why there is NOT DDA.

disagreeing with my THESIS does not qualify as an ANTITHESIS.

🧐

research design begins with a HYPOTHESIS, THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK, LITERATURE REVIEW, THEN DATA ANALYSIS (whether quantitative or qualitative, experimental or non-experimental)

I am 3 steps closer to  a research design than you are, but none of us are getting past ea‘s NDA on in game coding for h2h.

🎓

you just happened to fuck up and try to argue research methodology principles with a professor/researcher that specializes in  research methodology/design.

💤

chill out kid, some of us are adults with actual terminal degrees and published work.

💎

if you ea drones were as smart as you try to be online: the game would be better.

😵

yurugugottadie said:

you are confused kid.

i offered a HYPOTHESIS  and THEORY of how and why the game uses DDA.

I offered observed phenomena that has occurred beyond my personal experience. 

🧐

on the other hand, you offered an OPINION that there is no DDA, without a specific HYPOTHESIS and THEORY why there is NOT DDA.

disagreeing with my THESIS does not qualify as an ANTITHESIS.

🧐

research design begins with a HYPOTHESIS, THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK, LITERATURE REVIEW, THEN DATA ANALYSIS (whether quantitative or qualitative, experimental or non-experimental)

I am 3 steps closer to  a research design than you are, but none of us are getting past ea‘s NDA on in game coding for h2h.

🎓

you just happened to fuck up and try to argue research methodology principles with a professor/researcher that specializes in  research methodology/design.

💤

chill out kid, some of us are adults with actual terminal degrees and published work.

💎

if you ea drones were as smart as you try to be online: the game would be better.

😵

people have dropped (not settled!) lawsuits about DDA in madden. There is no DDA in madden and a professor in research would never try to place the burden of proof on me, the person arguing the negative, nor would they assume their individual experiences extrapolate on a larger scale with no evidence beyond anecdotes. 

there Is not DDA in madden, just shitty coding and RNG. If you’re trying to prove something use evidence. your EA drone comments are spammed all over the place. I’ve seen you inch into politics, and there I agree with you, but the EA drone comments are getting old. You continually claim that everyone who disagrees with you is paid. Why is that? Is it because otherwise you’d have to consider that you might be wrong about something? Take a moment to consider what evidence would prove to you DDA doesn’t exist, and consider why people who have sued for DDA in madden have received literally nothing.

I’m here to support anyone that thinks DDA IS IN FACT REAL AND IN EFFECT. Cuz nahhhhh shit don’t add up

SouljaSlim91 said:

I’m here to support anyone that thinks DDA IS IN FACT REAL AND IN EFFECT. Cuz nahhhhh shit don’t add up

Why do you think that?

SirPrimetime said:

usally when you win so much it feelis like that hit you with a nerf they never say it but I almost garunetty that happens

It’s cos your matchmaking gets harder

kaotikords said:

DDA that "doesnt exist"

It doesn’t lol

MrAgentSochi said:

DDA Moment

Yeah but it’s not in EA games, people use it as an excuse for Ls

💤

elmango30 said:

people have dropped (not settled!) lawsuits about DDA in madden. There is no DDA in madden and a professor in research would never try to place the burden of proof on me, the person arguing the negative, nor would they assume their individual experiences extrapolate on a larger scale with no evidence beyond anecdotes. 

there Is not DDA in madden, just shitty coding and RNG. If you’re trying to prove something use evidence. your EA drone comments are spammed all over the place. I’ve seen you inch into politics, and there I agree with you, but the EA drone comments are getting old. You continually claim that everyone who disagrees with you is paid. Why is that? Is it because otherwise you’d have to consider that you might be wrong about something? Take a moment to consider what evidence would prove to you DDA doesn’t exist, and consider why people who have sued for DDA in madden have received literally nothing.

again, you are confused.

lets review:

1. you offered an OPINION that there is no DDA, without a specific HYPOTHESIS, THEORY, or conclusive DATA to PROVE there is NOT DDA.

disagreeing with my THESIS does not qualify as an ANTITHESIS. 

2. losing a lawsuit does not equate to a scientific conclusion. hence, cases are appealed, and refiled with different outcomes

3.  on a non-ea page with users that complain about the same things in a general consensus, out  of 25-30 people, the 1 or 2 who defend ea, while trying to argue, belittle or insult those in the consensus of criticism gives “ea drone” energy.

🧐

4. you could just as easily ignore the post, most of us on the post agree.

you CHOSE to be disagreeable, while attempting to invoke research methodology in the wrong context. 

we as critics lose time and energy from the games treachery and incompetence, so we come on this site to critique/complain/inquire.

what do YOU lose by us complaining?

🤔

personally, i dont look for arguments with people i disagree with for free, i get paid to disagree.

you love ea, there is no DDA? why engage a post where everyone is saying the opposite?

nah.

just ignore the critics of ea or get called an ea drone.

yurugugottadie said:

again, you are confused.

lets review:

1. you offered an OPINION that there is no DDA, without a specific HYPOTHESIS, THEORY, or conclusive DATA to PROVE there is NOT DDA.

disagreeing with my THESIS does not qualify as an ANTITHESIS. 

2. losing a lawsuit does not equate to a scientific conclusion. hence, cases are appealed, and refiled with different outcomes

3.  on a non-ea page with users that complain about the same things in a general consensus, out  of 25-30 people, the 1 or 2 who defend ea, while trying to argue, belittle or insult those in the consensus of criticism gives “ea drone” energy.

🧐

4. you could just as easily ignore the post, most of us on the post agree.

you CHOSE to be disagreeable, while attempting to invoke research methodology in the wrong context. 

we as critics lose time and energy from the games treachery and incompetence, so we come on this site to critique/complain/inquire.

what do YOU lose by us complaining?

🤔

personally, i dont look for arguments with people i disagree with for free, i get paid to disagree.

you love ea, there is no DDA? why engage a post where everyone is saying the opposite?

nah.

just ignore the critics of ea or get called an ea drone.

I don’t love EA. they code their game poorly and dont listen to their fan base. I just get irritated when you request a hypothesis for a statement?

a hypothesis is a hypothetical if then

if I turn on a game of madden then there won’t be DDA in it

My hypothesis is supported by the fact that EA has shown the code to plaintiffs in those lawsuits and they dropped their lawsuits.   

I simply disagree with your methodology of being a conspiracy theorist and whining when you lose a video game

PS

dont claim to be a professor of logic or research and then request I prove a negative. It’s telling about your true qualifications

elmango30 said:

I don’t love EA. they code their game poorly and dont listen to their fan base. I just get irritated when you request a hypothesis for a statement?

a hypothesis is a hypothetical if then

if I turn on a game of madden then there won’t be DDA in it

My hypothesis is supported by the fact that EA has shown the code to plaintiffs in those lawsuits and they dropped their lawsuits.   

I simply disagree with your methodology of being a conspiracy theorist and whining when you lose a video game

PS

dont claim to be a professor of logic or research and then request I prove a negative. It’s telling about your true qualifications

you are drowning.

1. YOU brought the research methodology angle to a madden page, i just exposed your ignorance to actual research methodology. if you disagree with the SCIENTIFIC research methodology, you should avoid bringing  up research methodology to researchers.

2. ea didnt “win” a court case over DDA, ONE PLAINTIFF‘S legal team dropped a case after they saw “technical data,” one legal team’s decision to drop a case does NOT qualify as absolute “proof” DDA is not in the game. corporations dont patent technology that they have no intention of using. ea owns a patent for DDA.

meanwhile there are still ACTIVE suits against ea for DDA and monetization.

https://www.pocketgamer.biz/news/75951/dynamic-difficulty-class-action-lawsuit-against-ea-gets-dropped/

3. there is no “conspiracy theory” because conspiracy by LEGAL definition is:

“Conspiracy is an agreement between two or more people to commit an illegal act, along with an intent to achieve the agreement's goal. “

https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/conspiracy

ea has terms of service that allow them to do whatever they want, but public opinion of what they do is where they lose money. hence, ea drones like yourself wage lame arguments on game pages like this.

4. you STILL have not offered a HYPOTHESIS, to how and why ea would NOT use DDA. 

disagreeing with someone is not a hypothesis kid.

all you have done is try to conduct a middle school level argument on a thread critiquing ea’s shitty game.

5. again, why even engage a thread you disagree with just to argue for a billion dollar corporation?

next time, ignore the DDA complaints and move on.

as far as this teachable moment?

you lose.

ggs

yurugugottadie said:

you are drowning.

1. YOU brought the research methodology angle to a madden page, i just exposed your ignorance to actual research methodology. if you disagree with the SCIENTIFIC research methodology, you should avoid bringing  up research methodology to researchers.

2. ea didnt “win” a court case over DDA, ONE PLAINTIFF‘S legal team dropped a case after they saw “technical data,” one legal team’s decision to drop a case does NOT qualify as absolute “proof” DDA is not in the game. corporations dont patent technology that they have no intention of using. ea owns a patent for DDA.

meanwhile there are still ACTIVE suits against ea for DDA and monetization.

https://www.pocketgamer.biz/news/75951/dynamic-difficulty-class-action-lawsuit-against-ea-gets-dropped/

3. there is no “conspiracy theory” because conspiracy by LEGAL definition is:

“Conspiracy is an agreement between two or more people to commit an illegal act, along with an intent to achieve the agreement's goal. “

https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/conspiracy

ea has terms of service that allow them to do whatever they want, but public opinion of what they do is where they lose money. hence, ea drones like yourself wage lame arguments on game pages like this.

4. you STILL have not offered a HYPOTHESIS, to how and why ea would NOT use DDA. 

disagreeing with someone is not a hypothesis kid.

all you have done is try to conduct a middle school level argument on a thread critiquing ea’s shitty game.

5. again, why even engage a thread you disagree with just to argue for a billion dollar corporation?

next time, ignore the DDA complaints and move on.

as far as this teachable moment?

you lose.

ggs

burden of proof rests on the positive claim. Don’t believe shit without evidence, makes you look uneducated.   

stop lying about qualifications on a video game website. The reason they dropped it was because EA submitted information that made the lawyers realize the accusations were baseless.