my whole team is nerfed?

🤣🤣🤣🤣

or ea paid off the legal team?

we will never know….

🤔

what we do know:

1. ”burden of proof” is a legal term:

not a research methodology term.

you have to DISPROVE a THESIS, with an ANTITHESIS, hence science requires peer review and vetting using the scientific process, not jurisprudence.

 once again showing how far you are out of your league here trying to argue research methods with me

2. “dont believe shit without evidence” 🤣🤣🤣

who mentioned “beliefs???”

oh, you did.

over here we use:

OBSERVATION

CRITICAL THINKING

DEDUCTIVE REASONING

CORRELATION

HYPOTHESIS

🎓

if this was madden:

im up 874 to 0….

and yes, my intellect has DDA 

🤣🤣🤣🤣

ggs kid

this game is infuriating and everyone I play now is a super sweat

chrsprfft said:

Jeez what a duche this yuyu is, uh I got a diploma, so I'm smarterer than you....lol

i get it, thats your other page/best friend or you are triggered to see another ea drone get mopped.

again, why bother commenting for 3 hours on a thread you disagree with?

💤

also, its diplomaS (plural)

🎓

yurugugottadie said:

i get it, thats your other page/best friend or you are triggered to see another ea drone get mopped.

again, why bother commenting for 3 hours on a thread you disagree with?

💤

also, its diplomaS (plural)

🎓

Lol duche, just a reader, don't know any of these guys. Just know a entitled Karen when I see it. And by your over usage of usless emojis and horrible spacing and punctuation you're prob under 25. Have a fantastic day kiddo ;)

The gameplay has definitely felt extremely off the last couple of weeks imo. The most unexplainable things would happen but it’s routine things that Ive done all the time even previous maddens With no problems but lately it’s like the game has a mind of its own lol

💤

novadom1 said:

The gameplay has definitely felt extremely off the last couple of weeks imo. The most unexplainable things would happen but it’s routine things that Ive done all the time even previous maddens With no problems but lately it’s like the game has a mind of its own lol

exactly.

chrsprfft said:

Lol duche, just a reader, don't know any of these guys. Just know a entitled Karen when I see it. And by your over usage of usless emojis and horrible spacing and punctuation you're prob under 25. Have a fantastic day kiddo ;)

nah, this is your other page.

🤣🤣🤣🤣

not you trying to correct “spacing” and misspelling DOUCHE. 

douche.

also, its “an entitled karen“ not “a entitled karen”

😳

also, if you want to correct punctuation:

remember the periods/commas in your dumb ass comments.

😜

now run along little guy, aint nothing here for you but spelling/grammar lessons and humiliation.

🤡

TLDR; Anyone can say anything on the internet. I'm the king of Romania, it has the same validation of anything you say. Lay off the METH bro..... it's showing, and we care about you. Hope you get the help you need.

🤡

chrsprfft said:

TLDR; Anyone can say anything on the internet. I'm the king of Romania, it has the same validation of anything you say. Lay off the METH bro..... it's showing, and we care about you. Hope you get the help you need.

you are drowning in my urine
💦

anybody can say anything on the  internet, but everybody cant be RIGHT on the internet.

🧐

you just dont have what it takes to  match wits over here.

💤

whether or not i am what i claim to be: EVERYTHING i have stated is 100% accurate in terms of research methodology, research design, and critical thinking.

anybody that has experience in the academy or research knows im absolutely right.

🎓

meanwhile, you over here using two pages, hinging on my every comment and still getting mopped.

😵

ggs kid

yurugugottadie said:

🤣🤣🤣🤣

or ea paid off the legal team?

we will never know….

🤔

what we do know:

1. ”burden of proof” is a legal term:

not a research methodology term.

you have to DISPROVE a THESIS, with an ANTITHESIS, hence science requires peer review and vetting using the scientific process, not jurisprudence.

 once again showing how far you are out of your league here trying to argue research methods with me

2. “dont believe shit without evidence” 🤣🤣🤣

who mentioned “beliefs???”

oh, you did.

over here we use:

OBSERVATION

CRITICAL THINKING

DEDUCTIVE REASONING

CORRELATION

HYPOTHESIS

🎓

if this was madden:

im up 874 to 0….

and yes, my intellect has DDA 

🤣🤣🤣🤣

ggs kid

You didn’t even reply to me, just condescended despite clearly lying about your credentials

imma start over

why do you think there’s DDA? Do good players consistently have more flukes against them?

chrsprfft said:

Jeez what a duche this yuyu is, uh I got a diploma, so I'm smarterer than you....lol

Chrsprfft the goat lmao. This guy just says

DDA exists because my player dropped a pick

and I say

thats not evidence

and he says

give me evidence it doesn’t exist

yurugugottadie said:

🤣🤣🤣🤣

or ea paid off the legal team?

we will never know….

🤔

what we do know:

1. ”burden of proof” is a legal term:

not a research methodology term.

you have to DISPROVE a THESIS, with an ANTITHESIS, hence science requires peer review and vetting using the scientific process, not jurisprudence.

 once again showing how far you are out of your league here trying to argue research methods with me

2. “dont believe shit without evidence” 🤣🤣🤣

who mentioned “beliefs???”

oh, you did.

over here we use:

OBSERVATION

CRITICAL THINKING

DEDUCTIVE REASONING

CORRELATION

HYPOTHESIS

🎓

if this was madden:

im up 874 to 0….

and yes, my intellect has DDA 

🤣🤣🤣🤣

ggs kid

If you have an opinion give evidence to support it. your evidence is anecdotal. Also I don’t know that guy. Whether or not DDA exists in madden is not the same as trying to prove a scientific theory or correlation. It is simply trying to prove the existence of something. You said it existed. Prove it. And if you bring up anecdotes again I will know you don’t know what you’re talking about. Ggs little buddy