Nyheim Hines is great, but I haven't used his 96 yet, so take that as you will
noahunbanned
Posts: 224 |
0
stinkybananas
Posts: 969 |
540
noahunbanned said:BIG time question: Faalele or Vita Vea?
ryan stonehouse
SIEGS12
Posts: 1 |
55
Jacktheoiler said:As someone who uses their RB a LOT (lots of running, lots of Texas routes and routes to the flats) Marshall Faulk has been an absolute quiet GOAT.
94 speed, 94 acc, 94 BTK, 89 SRR, 87 Catch, with 0 AP grab n go, and 1 AP short in elite, and 1 AP RB apprentice if no HRM.
Is he still the best receiving back or is there someone I can upgrade to? I just haven’t seen anyone like him
I think Byars's receiving stats are very underappreciated, 92 srr and 94 catch is crazy. Just have bad receiving abilities but definitely the best receiving back in terms of stats.
MedMailman
Posts: 94 |
5
bigmanhuntr said:Faelele feels like just another wide receiver and with how slim his player model is sometimes I mistake him for my Andre Reed! Probably the best card I have used all year with his route running and jukemove alone!
Who?
Edawg7
Posts: 88 |
625
Jacktheoiler said:As someone who uses their RB a LOT (lots of running, lots of Texas routes and routes to the flats) Marshall Faulk has been an absolute quiet GOAT.
94 speed, 94 acc, 94 BTK, 89 SRR, 87 Catch, with 0 AP grab n go, and 1 AP short in elite, and 1 AP RB apprentice if no HRM.
Is he still the best receiving back or is there someone I can upgrade to? I just haven’t seen anyone like him
I still think that Byars is the best pure RB in the game, but Dillon has some competition for the top spot. this is because Freight Train has a chance to activate if you throw it quick enough to your RB that it counts as a rush. Byars is so good though.
Zookur27
Posts: 141 |
124
bigmanhuntr said:Faelele feels like just another wide receiver and with how slim his player model is sometimes I mistake him for my Andre Reed! Probably the best card I have used all year with his route running and jukemove alone!
loloolol
Imtrash16
Posts: 330 |
470
Jacktheoiler said:As someone who uses their RB a LOT (lots of running, lots of Texas routes and routes to the flats) Marshall Faulk has been an absolute quiet GOAT.
94 speed, 94 acc, 94 BTK, 89 SRR, 87 Catch, with 0 AP grab n go, and 1 AP short in elite, and 1 AP RB apprentice if no HRM.
Is he still the best receiving back or is there someone I can upgrade to? I just haven’t seen anyone like him
Me
Imtrash16
Posts: 330 |
470
Me
lwashburn92
Posts: 313 |
645
Davis 0 ap short in.
LamboV
Posts: 19 |
40
If you send king Henry on a streak he can burn some corners.
RobertJetz
Posts: 4 |
5
I think that Austin Ekeler is also a solid receiving back. He also has the highest overall.
RobertJetz
Posts: 4 |
5
King henry is very good because hes fast too!
Loco1332
Posts: 257 |
0
For me personally Ekelar has been the best receiving back.. Byars was really good.. Faulk was really good also..
ItsBoneDaddy
Posts: 1 |
270
CP does great for me on my bears TT
Hawkswag27
Posts: 1 |
500
Byars is Faulk on steroids. Look at Byars's route running
Log in to join the conversation