CNIZZOTE said:In economic terms - they call that the free rider problem (https://www.investopedia.com/terms/f/freeriderproblem.asp). People benefit from the benefits negotiated for them by the union but refuse to be members of the union. It's garbage.
I don’t want to get into the ethics of what happens without unions in a world full of exploitation, but the value of unions varies by case. Apart from the safety advancements that are attributable both to unionization and also to decent non-union employers, unions are little more than a mechanism that in practice reduces the value of an employee to an average of all of the employees within their class. If I excel at my job, I don’t get better opportunities within certain union schemes, while the scrubs in the same department that ride free calling in sick or bailing on work just less than would allow for firing may have better opportunities just because they’ve been around longer. I think you have to acknowledge this fundamental flaw of many unions long before you argue that people are getting a free ride because independent lines of employment have an established standard that they can negotiate against.
Besides, the NFL Player’s Association totally sold out non-veterans in their post-2010 wage scales. Draft selection shouldn’t determine a player’s value over three years. There are late-round picks that vastly outperform top-ten picks, and their earning capacity over their career is vastly diminished, especially in cases of injury early in their career.