Way to stay classy Philly Fans

Just like the time the Philly fans threw ice at the players and coaches..... this is why people don't like Eagles fans.

https://nypost.com/2023/02/13/eagles-fans-flood-philly-streets-after-super-bowl-loss-f-k-the-chiefs/

Hey, wouldnt you be mad abt a dumb call and shitty field?

Geo7030 said:

Hey, wouldnt you be mad abt a dumb call and shitty field?

The field, yes. There are other ways to handle anger though.

Bradberry admitted to the holding call later.

QB283 said:

The field, yes. There are other ways to handle anger though.

Bradberry admitted to the holding call later.

Then again the ref said to espn that bradberry, "The defender grabbed the jersey with his right hand " yet when you look back at the replay his jersey didnt move

Geo7030 said:

Hey, wouldnt you be mad abt a dumb call and shitty field?

Even if it was just one call that cause Philly to lose (it wasn't) , there's no reason to riot in the streets and chant obscenities. 

People in Ukraine have a reason to be angry and demonstrative. 

This was a football game

Martyr1968 said:

Even if it was just one call that cause Philly to lose (it wasn't) , there's no reason to riot in the streets and chant obscenities. 

People in Ukraine have a reason to be angry and demonstrative. 

This was a football game

ur right it wasnt just one call. devonta smith catch getting called back was dumb too. especially how they made stopped us from snapping the ball before chiefs could challenge

Martyr1968 said:

Even if it was just one call that cause Philly to lose (it wasn't) , there's no reason to riot in the streets and chant obscenities. 

People in Ukraine have a reason to be angry and demonstrative. 

This was a football game

You don’t get to decide what is riot worthy or not

Geo7030 said:

Then again the ref said to espn that bradberry, "The defender grabbed the jersey with his right hand " yet when you look back at the replay his jersey didnt move

A). There are stills that show his hand on the jersey. It's undeniable. JuJu was re-routed. Now was it enough to make that call at that time? Debatable. But it clearly impeded his route.. Would I have made that call? Probably not.... but then the refs owed.KC big time for multiple poor and. Missed calls

B) When the player admits doing it , trust me,  he did it . I've been around football 45+:years and.players don't admit to something they didn't do

C) By the rule the refs quoted either Miles Sanders' ball was a catch and fumble 6 for the Chiefs or Goeddert's juggle was not a catch.  Cant have it both ways.  So Philly fans should be haply they got the benefit of both calls

we all know philly fans are insanely annoying so im not at all surprised

Martyr1968 said:

A). There are stills that show his hand on the jersey. It's undeniable. JuJu was re-routed. Now was it enough to make that call at that time? Debatable. But it clearly impeded his route.. Would I have made that call? Probably not.... but then the refs owed.KC big time for multiple poor and. Missed calls

B) When the player admits doing it , trust me,  he did it . I've been around football 45+:years and.players don't admit to something they didn't do

C) By the rule the refs quoted either Miles Sanders' ball was a catch and fumble 6 for the Chiefs or Goeddert's juggle was not a catch.  Cant have it both ways.  So Philly fans should be haply they got the benefit of both calls

but sanders ball was not a catch. sure he had 2 feet down but he went literally nowhere before getting blown up. and what im sayin abt goederts catch is if they gon say goedert caught it then how did devonta smith not catch his? very similar plays. only difference is goedert stayed on his feet

Martyr1968 said:

A). There are stills that show his hand on the jersey. It's undeniable. JuJu was re-routed. Now was it enough to make that call at that time? Debatable. But it clearly impeded his route.. Would I have made that call? Probably not.... but then the refs owed.KC big time for multiple poor and. Missed calls

B) When the player admits doing it , trust me,  he did it . I've been around football 45+:years and.players don't admit to something they didn't do

C) By the rule the refs quoted either Miles Sanders' ball was a catch and fumble 6 for the Chiefs or Goeddert's juggle was not a catch.  Cant have it both ways.  So Philly fans should be haply they got the benefit of both calls

It definitely was holding but im just sad that a great game had to come down to a call that in my opinion they should have let go.

Daddy said:

You don’t get to decide what is riot worthy or not

Seriously, that's your takeaway. If that's all you got , it's really not worth wasting any more time responding to anything you write.

Geo7030 said:

but sanders ball was not a catch. sure he had 2 feet down but he went literally nowhere before getting blown up. and what im sayin abt goederts catch is if they gon say goedert caught it then how did devonta smith not catch his? very similar plays. only difference is goedert stayed on his feet

By the same rule used for Goeddert that was the very definition of a catch. He established possession with 2 feet in bounds. If you say he had to take another step post possession then Goeddert's catch would have been ruled incomplete because his next step was out of bounds.

stinkybananas said:

It definitely was holding but im just sad that a great game had to come down to a call that in my opinion they should have let go.

It wouldn't have been that close if Butker didn't tank that 1st half field goal anyway