Not a fan of the Clayton card but wow that Brooks card and the Tillman card really are playing well for me.
Even better than their ratings
I'm pleasantly surprised by this Legends release
What do you guys think of these cards?
Martyr1968
Posts: 4123 |
6,923
chefbulldog
Posts: 385 |
1,260
I pulled Brooks from the free comp pass late in the day. His price had already tanked and I was already running 3 Lurk Artist LBs…..but I switched playbooks and threw him out there too. He had two pick sixes on his own in the first game. Really liking him.
I have All Madden Lott and BND Kearse at safety, but thinking I might drop Lott for Tillman. Love Lott, but the Tillman card, on veteran’s day, hits home.
Martyr1968
Posts: 4123 |
6,923
chefbulldog said:I pulled Brooks from the free comp pass late in the day. His price had already tanked and I was already running 3 Lurk Artist LBs…..but I switched playbooks and threw him out there too. He had two pick sixes on his own in the first game. Really liking him.
I have All Madden Lott and BND Kearse at safety, but thinking I might drop Lott for Tillman. Love Lott, but the Tillman card, on veteran’s day, hits home.
I'd keep Lott and replace Kearse. I took Kearse out of my lineup to make room for Pat.
But yeah, Brooks cards always play really well in Madden
Grats on the pull and on the W!
chefbulldog
Posts: 385 |
1,260
Martyr1968 said:I'd keep Lott and replace Kearse. I took Kearse out of my lineup to make room for Pat.
But yeah, Brooks cards always play really well in Madden
Grats on the pull and on the W!
I have 30 Cowboys, so Kearse is boosted for me. A lot to work with, which is always a fun problem.
StoicTrader
Posts: 1138 |
1,960
I think they both are nice, both went into my starting lineup, wish Brooks had a better legend x factor
Breakluna
Posts: 5449 |
12.6K
Got brooks from the comp pass reward. He's played well in the couple h2h games I've played. He got a a couple interceptions for me. Also I loved how he played one of those weird hb corner routes. He was in man coverage stuck with the hb like glue.
Martyr1968
Posts: 4123 |
6,923
chefbulldog said:I have 30 Cowboys, so Kearse is boosted for me. A lot to work with, which is always a fun problem.
Yeah but Kearse had really poor jumping, run stopping ratings (bkshd, ibl) , low CIT, and pretty poor traits.
I had issues with him getting blocked out of plays, going for swats instead of picks....
Even with the +1 speed Lott is better than Kearse
Martyr1968
Posts: 4123 |
6,923
StoicTrader said:I think they both are nice, both went into my starting lineup, wish Brooks had a better legend x factor
?? Brooks has 2 great Legend X factors...
Probably the best user in the game right now and as CPU controlled he has 90+ man, 90+ zone, 92 AGI,.93 COD and like 92 jumping.
Insane card , bro
Martyr1968
Posts: 4123 |
6,923
Breakluna said:Got brooks from the comp pass reward. He's played well in the couple h2h games I've played. He got a a couple interceptions for me. Also I loved how he played one of those weird hb corner routes. He was in man coverage stuck with the hb like glue.
91 man cvg on a LB with 91 speed... he's gonna stick to a lot of HBs in man or.match :)
StoicTrader
Posts: 1138 |
1,960
Martyr1968 said:?? Brooks has 2 great Legend X factors...
Probably the best user in the game right now and as CPU controlled he has 90+ man, 90+ zone, 92 AGI,.93 COD and like 92 jumping.
Insane card , bro
yeah the card is solid, his x factor that automatically triggers is lurk artist for 0 AP which is cool, the other ones all too difficult to activate IMO, running that X factor, saved 1 AP to put lurk artist on Kuechly, bout to try to make a playoff run and see
AZCARDS
Posts: 2175 |
18
Yo that pat tillman card hits different literally!! I n the games I’ve played he’s been a force at sublb, a pick six, 2 other picks, and an FF and I don’t even have crusher on him. Plus he can bring down any RB despite his siz, absolutely recommend him 100%!!! Gonna try out Brooks but I think I’m gonna pass on Clayton as well, he doesn’t look horrible but just not any reason to replace Hop or Kirk, or even Hollywood really who’s a lot cheaper
Martyr1968
Posts: 4123 |
6,923
AZCARDS said:Yo that pat tillman card hits different literally!! I n the games I’ve played he’s been a force at sublb, a pick six, 2 other picks, and an FF and I don’t even have crusher on him. Plus he can bring down any RB despite his siz, absolutely recommend him 100%!!! Gonna try out Brooks but I think I’m gonna pass on Clayton as well, he doesn’t look horrible but just not any reason to replace Hop or Kirk, or even Hollywood really who’s a lot cheaper
Agree w all this
Let me know how you like Brooks. He feels so smooth to me
chefbulldog
Posts: 385 |
1,260
Martyr1968 said:Yeah but Kearse had really poor jumping, run stopping ratings (bkshd, ibl) , low CIT, and pretty poor traits.
I had issues with him getting blocked out of plays, going for swats instead of picks....
Even with the +1 speed Lott is better than Kearse
Agreed. Kept Ronnie, Tillman, and Brooks.
chefbulldog
Posts: 385 |
1,260
Martyr1968 said:91 man cvg on a LB with 91 speed... he's gonna stick to a lot of HBs in man or.match :)
Tried 4 lurk aritists in 3-4. Just could not cover the flats consistently. What are you running match from? Had luck in 43 over, an 61, and over g.
Martyr1968
Posts: 4123 |
6,923
chefbulldog said:Tried 4 lurk aritists in 3-4. Just could not cover the flats consistently. What are you running match from? Had luck in 43 over, an 61, and over g.
Well, lurk artist doesn't make coverage better so that's not going to help coverage but it will get you animations from. LBs on passes they are close to....
I run Big Nickel G..... this let's me have Tillman, Dawkins, Lott on the field in multiple positions. I can also sub in NTL or Champ at deep safety for coverage purposes. I will switch around at SubLB in that set between Kuwchly, Brooks, Dawkins , Tillman. There are multiple plays in that formation that match, cover 4 qtrs, cover 4 palms, cover 6 trap I believe , cover 9, etc
3-4 is going to be harder to cover the pass because you have 4 LBs in the field in coverage
Log in to join the conversation