Anyone else got the same players as last week think ea fucked up again I was expecting likely or sum1 new not the same cards like if I would have known that what’s the point of the set I already had clowney from the divisional set
cursedsoulm81
Posts: 15 |
165
FirefighterBuell
Posts: 301 |
315
It really makes no sense that they put an objective to complete that set. ive already completed that set enough times to pick every player.
cursedsoulm81
Posts: 15 |
165
FirefighterBuell said:It really makes no sense that they put an objective to complete that set. ive already completed that set enough times to pick every player.
think ea gonna fix it tmr there jus lazy definetly should be 91 or higher from here on out jus gonna hold onto it for now
RonaldDobbs
Posts: 1359 |
5
It’s been the same players all three weeks. They said that it would be the same players every week, it would just cost more each week.
Law412
Posts: 1074 |
1,585
cursedsoulm81 said:think ea gonna fix it tmr there jus lazy definetly should be 91 or higher from here on out jus gonna hold onto it for now
no it’s not going to change and it never said that they were gonna add more players for the bnd pack. Ea definitely didn’t mess up for once, this is exactly how they said it would go. These players are the ones that can be upgraded. They aren’t adding any new ones to the pack, it’s the same cards that can just be upgraded to 93s at the end. It just costs more now
Last edited by
Law412
- ,
edited 1
time in total.
The509
Posts: 619 |
5
cursedsoulm81 said:think ea gonna fix it tmr there jus lazy definetly should be 91 or higher from here on out jus gonna hold onto it for now
They are 91+… just have to upgrade them with training
The509
Posts: 619 |
5
cursedsoulm81 said:Anyone else got the same players as last week think ea fucked up again I was expecting likely or sum1 new not the same cards like if I would have known that what’s the point of the set I already had clowney from the divisional set
They never said there will be new players. Its the same players every week. Winning teams upgrade free. Losers cost training. Each one will goto 93 ovr
Kyleb63
Posts: 657 |
1,295
You’re paying extra for the option value each week. They actually communicated this properly for once…the only people complaining are the ones who don’t pay attention.
emcdavit
Posts: 454 |
1
I completed it cuz I thought it would give me a 94. oh well, I’ll take a 91 😭
MrAgentSochi
Posts: 12064 |
11.9K
Kyleb63 said:You’re paying extra for the option value each week. They actually communicated this properly for once…the only people complaining are the ones who don’t pay attention.
Yep. And even if EA failed to communicate things properly, plenty of people on here would've (which they did).
Law412
Posts: 1074 |
1,585
emcdavit said:I completed it cuz I thought it would give me a 94. oh well, I’ll take a 91 😭
I mean realistically if you did the set the first week you could have 93s for the low. Even with the losing teams that cost training the sets only cost me like 100k including the training I’ll need to Upgrade And honestly probably even less then that. 1 88, 1 85 and 3 82s you couldn’t beat it
Last edited by
Law412
- ,
edited 1
time in total.
emcdavit
Posts: 454 |
1
Law412 said:I mean realistically if you did the set the first week you could have 93s for the low. Even with the losing teams that cost training the sets only cost me like 100k including the training I’ll need to Upgrade And honestly probably even less then that. 1 88, 1 85 and 3 82s you couldn’t beat it
Yeah I know lol. I was just disappointed cuz I thought I was getting a 94 😂
sportswriter09
Posts: 150 |
855
People don’t read/think. EA sucks, but they didn’t do anything wrong in this case. Get a clue.
Log in to join the conversation