It seems so weird that through both Super Bowl promos we got a total of two o-lineman with only one being usable. It's not like the Chiefs and Niners have crappy o-lines either! It doesn't make a whole lot of sense that we got four TE's, four RE's, and zero LG, RG, or RT. Was this just a half-assed attempt to nerf SB TTs?
walkman
Posts: 3 |
218
Kyleb63
Posts: 657 |
1,295
walkman said:It seems so weird that through both Super Bowl promos we got a total of two o-lineman with only one being usable. It's not like the Chiefs and Niners have crappy o-lines either! It doesn't make a whole lot of sense that we got four TE's, four RE's, and zero LG, RG, or RT. Was this just a half-assed attempt to nerf SB TTs?
I was bummed about this, but the reality is you can get more than 90 Super Bowl chems into a lineup without the linemen, fullbacks or a kicker. I decided to run 70 Super Bowl, 25 Titans, 5 Niners and 5 Chiefs. I put Skoronski, Creed, Allen and Runyan on the line.
Rollhumps
Posts: 1221 |
735
they didn't want to make it as easy to get to the 70/70 like they did with Ghosts I guess.
frostybirdman
Posts: 1302 |
2,031
Run playoff o-linemen at the vacant positions. That'll get you by until TOTY and then can replace the o-line then. I'm running a 70 SB and 55 Playoff team.
baumonkey94
Posts: 148 |
855
Agreed
peatrick
Posts: 3801 |
16.6K
Kyleb63 said:I was bummed about this, but the reality is you can get more than 90 Super Bowl chems into a lineup without the linemen, fullbacks or a kicker. I decided to run 70 Super Bowl, 25 Titans, 5 Niners and 5 Chiefs. I put Skoronski, Creed, Allen and Runyan on the line.
I liek your style. Been running 70/70 SB, 25/50 49ers and 6/6 AKA Crews (Y2K), personally. I used to have 15/15 Playoffs, but have since removed/replace Kelce's bitchass, as i no longer have any need for 0AP TE Apprentice. Doug Williams has been fantastic. Wish it were Steve Young, but oh well.
Log in to join the conversation