Wondering cuz I got the new 97 Kyle Pitts and I've heard people playing him at WR. I've never tried it. Tbh my receivers have been invisible when I play, and I use my RB and TE a lot (hence I got pitts) but wondering if it makes that much of a difference to have him at WR. Currently have 95 Rice, Ridley, then 94 DJ moore.
atlasgg
Posts: 7 |
530
SportsPerson94
Posts: 4258 |
765
I thought people mostly use TE at WR for the blocking stats and height but idk
von11
Posts: 1032 |
3,065
I used them earlier in the year...it helps with the run, but they don't do as well in most passing schemes. I find using the WRs more fun (bigger plays)...but...it is free to try it and see what you think.
Law412
Posts: 1074 |
1,585
atlasgg said:Wondering cuz I got the new 97 Kyle Pitts and I've heard people playing him at WR. I've never tried it. Tbh my receivers have been invisible when I play, and I use my RB and TE a lot (hence I got pitts) but wondering if it makes that much of a difference to have him at WR. Currently have 95 Rice, Ridley, then 94 DJ moore.
I used the 90 unstoppable pitts at wr earlier in the Year and he was my wr1 for a long time. He was an animal out there, I can imagine his 97 is just as crazy as a wr
Breakluna
Posts: 5449 |
12.6K
Just depends on what's available and your scheme. 97 Pitts is the fastest offensive skill player in the game without TT boosts. So naturally you want to put him wherever in your scheme can best make use of that. For some people that's going to be WR.
I wouldn't say I prefer TE at WR though. Since TE tend to be bigger and heavier sometimes they'll be too heavy to get the good juke. Also I'm not sure if this is true, but last year I believe there was something about how shorter players are better at cutting/running routes than taller players which.
Log in to join the conversation