only losing to 86 ovr teams

RobStillRules1 said:

An excuse for people losing to a better opponent when their fragile ego can't accept reality

incorrect. DDA is Difficulty Dynamic Adjustments which is 100% coded in the game. 

Essentially when your cards are far more superior than your opponents, the game equalises the playing field. your 94 speed players won’t run by their 88 speed guys, your 90+ CIT guys will drop balls in traffic while they hold onto everything and so on

it is not an excuse, i have been at both ends of it lmao. tested it out myself with budget cards and i was getting a lot of crazy shit my way that i don’t get with my regular 91 team

RyyoLurkedEm said:

incorrect. DDA is Difficulty Dynamic Adjustments which is 100% coded in the game. 

Essentially when your cards are far more superior than your opponents, the game equalises the playing field. your 94 speed players won’t run by their 88 speed guys, your 90+ CIT guys will drop balls in traffic while they hold onto everything and so on

it is not an excuse, i have been at both ends of it lmao. tested it out myself with budget cards and i was getting a lot of crazy shit my way that i don’t get with my regular 91 team

in response to this though, if your team is stacked there is still not a reason you can’t pull away with a win. it may just be closer than it should. 
 

firm believer in scheme over team, you shouldn’t automatically win because you have a better squad but at the same time, it is annoying when the DDA is plain obvious. Just don’t get frustrated and start throwing dumb shit

DDA/ or he is better than you only two outcomes m8 no point in complaining like the rest of us have juts enjoy what you have but don’t let ea get away with moneygrabbing

RyyoLurkedEm said:

incorrect. DDA is Difficulty Dynamic Adjustments which is 100% coded in the game. 

Essentially when your cards are far more superior than your opponents, the game equalises the playing field. your 94 speed players won’t run by their 88 speed guys, your 90+ CIT guys will drop balls in traffic while they hold onto everything and so on

it is not an excuse, i have been at both ends of it lmao. tested it out myself with budget cards and i was getting a lot of crazy shit my way that i don’t get with my regular 91 team

Disagree, it's been proven to not have been used in h2h

RobStillRules1 said:

Disagree, it's been proven to not have been used in h2h

i mean i’ve seen it happen for me and against me 🤷🏼‍♂️🤷🏼‍♂️ i burnt talib with AKA marvin harrison

EightyOne said:

There are 3 possible reasons.

He's better than you.

DDA.

A combination of the first 2.

combination of the 2 i'd say

😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭

ultrarunnersean said:

Nah has to be rigged /s

Guys who know how to play don't need a stacked team.

I'm not saying you didn't get robbed but 99% of my picks, I knew they were picks as soon as I threw the ball.

Alot of players think that having a stacked team is a guaranteed win, but I say otherwise.

That's just my experience taking.

RyyoLurkedEm said:

i mean i’ve seen it happen for me and against me 🤷🏼‍♂️🤷🏼‍♂️ i burnt talib with AKA marvin harrison

he also made that up. The only “proof” it “doesn’t” exist is EA saying it doesn’t.

I mean maybe it’s possible he’s a really good player…..

RobStillRules1 said:

Disagree, it's been proven to not have been used in h2h

No it hasn't. Go and get your 'proof' and post it then.

DDA is in the game. Of course it is. And lets not forget that the difference between 90SPD and 87SPD is negligible anyway. Definitely so when you start adding in other numbers like ACC, PRC and AWR. 

EA's number one metric is ENGAGEMENT. You only get that if people keep playing. Players who lost every H2H match-up because they were useless and lazy would stop playing and I'd bet good money that a high percentage of whales on MUT have both those traits so it'd be even worse. Most normal people, those that might only spend for big promos etc would also play less and BUY less if it became clear that the $$ wasn't making a difference.

Anyone who says there is no DDA in MUT needs a cogent explanation for why it WOULDN'T be in the game.

mythomaniac said:

Guys who know how to play don't need a stacked team.

I'm not saying you didn't get robbed but 99% of my picks, I knew they were picks as soon as I threw the ball.

Alot of players think that having a stacked team is a guaranteed win, but I say otherwise.

That's just my experience taking.

This. I play NMS and a TT. Which means I'm always 2 or 3OVR behind a big chunk of MUT players. I'm not a really good player but I do play a fair bit of H2H and am in an online CFM and would consider myself decent. I also know how to play football as I coach two junior teams. I think I have 3 or 4 Superbowl wins and I'll get 4 wins in most of the H2H ladders I play.

I still see DDA regularly. Both for and against me. Funny enough it happens most often going for that 5th win. Which is this games version of a 'top level boss' if you think about it. Strange that.

EightyOne said:

No it hasn't. Go and get your 'proof' and post it then.

DDA is in the game. Of course it is. And lets not forget that the difference between 90SPD and 87SPD is negligible anyway. Definitely so when you start adding in other numbers like ACC, PRC and AWR. 

EA's number one metric is ENGAGEMENT. You only get that if people keep playing. Players who lost every H2H match-up because they were useless and lazy would stop playing and I'd bet good money that a high percentage of whales on MUT have both those traits so it'd be even worse. Most normal people, those that might only spend for big promos etc would also play less and BUY less if it became clear that the $$ wasn't making a difference.

Anyone who says there is no DDA in MUT needs a cogent explanation for why it WOULDN'T be in the game.

Yes it has, and still waiting for proof it's in the game besides saying I lost to a lesser overall team. It's always been scheme over team, overall can only cover minor deficiencies in scheme

EightyOne said:

This. I play NMS and a TT. Which means I'm always 2 or 3OVR behind a big chunk of MUT players. I'm not a really good player but I do play a fair bit of H2H and am in an online CFM and would consider myself decent. I also know how to play football as I coach two junior teams. I think I have 3 or 4 Superbowl wins and I'll get 4 wins in most of the H2H ladders I play.

I still see DDA regularly. Both for and against me. Funny enough it happens most often going for that 5th win. Which is this games version of a 'top level boss' if you think about it. Strange that.

If that's the case, we have a big problem in MUT H2H.

Competitive games should not be influenced in any way.

I honestly hope that EA is not fixing these games, that would be a huge blow to the brand and their competitive integrity.