Faneca vs Quenton, Micah vs Clay

Posts: 4117 |

6,923

So at first glance Faneca (97 OVR) looks better than Nelson (PU to 96 OVR).

1 less strength with Jets chem. +4 PBK, +3 PBP and PBF. +1 RBK.

But Nelson has 10 lbs on him, +8 agility, +1 speed....Faneca has +5 accel

Nelson also has +2 IBL and +3 LBK which I think may make a difference on a Guard.

So what do you guys think? I'll try Faneca and hold onto Nelson I guess, in case...I use Post Up on both.

As far as .Micah vs Clay, I think it has to be Micah only because that card just plays insane and that speed is end game. But strength goes to Clay, so does block shed.... but somehow Micah gets inside stuff for 1 AP. Micah has better coverage and that finesse move. I think Micah ...any opinions on this one?

Posts: 779 |

465

I think Micha plays well, but he still pales in comparison to guys like DT/Ware as a pass rusher. I purchased one as an investment and have kept him on the team for now just due to his speed as a spy/contain against the Henry’s and Hurts.

Clay looks borderline unusable as a pass rusher. If you want to slap no outsiders on him for 1AP he would be a serviceable run stopping OLB, but his lack of weight really wouldn’t do much as a DE. I would stay away

Oline is so inconsistent just get the heaviest guys you can for cheap(ish). I run all NAT 91-94s and have never noticed any difference trying any of the higher end/expensive dudes. Not worth it @ all