Does anyone know if the bnd legend is a full legend or lower version of a full one.
Staffordescaped
Posts: 113 |
10
Last edited by
Staffordescaped
- ,
edited 1
time in total.
kaotikords
Posts: 10298 |
5,651
Without seeing the exact wording, itll probably be any 89 card but it may just be the old full ones.
acomplixsituation
Posts: 2000 |
1,100
Having actually completed this and got the choice of reward, they are the Boss 89 Legends.
You have one choice of either Steve Atwater, Jerome Bettis, Lester Hayes, Jay Hilgenberg, Deacon Jones, Anthony Munoz, Andre Reed or Mike Vrabel.
Staffordescaped
Posts: 113 |
10
acomplixsituation said:Having actually completed this and got the choice of reward, they are the Boss 89 Legends.
You have one choice of either Steve Atwater, Jerome Bettis, Lester Hayes, Jay Hilgenberg, Deacon Jones, Anthony Munoz, Andre Reed or Mike Vrabel.
nooooooooooo
acomplixsituation
Posts: 2000 |
1,100
Staffordescaped said:nooooooooooo
Sorry to disappoint. I had my eye on some of the 89 Legend set piece players as well, but no dice on this occasion.
kaotikords
Posts: 10298 |
5,651
acomplixsituation said:Having actually completed this and got the choice of reward, they are the Boss 89 Legends.
You have one choice of either Steve Atwater, Jerome Bettis, Lester Hayes, Jay Hilgenberg, Deacon Jones, Anthony Munoz, Andre Reed or Mike Vrabel.
At least some of them are useable I guess.
Bettis is a solid power back still.
Hilenberg fine C if youre not using a 90 MF
Jones for Edge Threat
Munoz for EP
Thats about it.
mubby33
Posts: 635 |
930
I'm sure I'll get flamed for this but this is why PUs were good for the market and NATs could still have value because you could use them in a PU and then use a PU pass. Im assuming these legends will be needed later when these guys get ULs otherwise these cards are worthless. I mean I hated PUs as they were a coin sink but it helped low overalls still be valuable.
Log in to join the conversation