Theme team chem worth it?

When building a team do you guys prioritize more team chemistry or the best ratings/abilities to fill your team?  I have been building a Lions team 40/50 right now, and to get 50/50 my team would be pretty weak in a lot of spots.

Thats the balance you have to do. 

Is 1 speed good enough? Do you want 2? Are you okay with weak spots?

I would say, right now, only if you do a Legends one

Definitely seems like it's not worth the boosts at this point.

The only reason for a tt is for the speed if your ok without it then you don’t need a tt

If you want to compete, Legends 40/40 is the way to go. You could go with a 49ers/Raiders 50/50. I've been 50/50 Panthers every year since they introduced actual team chems but this year it's been miserable trying to go 50/50

If you want the three big letters that decide every ea game on your side then go for it!

Well if you want to have the same players as everyone else then do that or just do your favorite team

Legends is definitely worth it but I don't think a 50/50 team is worth it yet in mut.  I wish our team captains got at least ×3 team chems. Hopefully they drop more team diamonds and some stocking stuffers like last year that gave us ×2 team chems. A 40/50 TT could also be worth it. I'm keeping alot of 49ers players cause ill eventually go full 50/50 as more cards that get ×2 or ×3 are released.

forzfedv6 said:

When building a team do you guys prioritize more team chemistry or the best ratings/abilities to fill your team?  I have been building a Lions team 40/50 right now, and to get 50/50 my team would be pretty weak in a lot of spots.

https://www.mut.gg/23/lineup-builder/6b34f678-4a8a-4107-bdfe-5459138f897b/ This is how i have my lions 50/50 TT going right now, and at this point since they are recycling, im just replacing with higher ovr players.

I actually like going with a TT because it limits the amount of options and as a NMS player, I cannot keep up with the prices of the Legends. A 50/50 TT still leaves room for 5 "wildcards". In my Ravens team, I have used those for LE, RE, LG, CB and currently Gano (but I would like to replace him with Tucker at some point). I am having fun and am not completely destroyed in H2H, so I am fine with it

Deimoseloc said:

https://www.mut.gg/23/lineup-builder/6b34f678-4a8a-4107-bdfe-5459138f897b/ This is how i have my lions 50/50 TT going right now, and at this point since they are recycling, im just replacing with higher ovr players.

Nice team build, kinda what I am looking at going towards.  Does Stafford play better than Culpepper?  I have been using Culpepper and more of a run option offense, his trucking and BTK are pretty good.  https://www.mut.gg/23/lineup-builder/45cfcb2e-6a64-4eef-bedb-937d7bc59d76/

Just do 50/50 and cheat in the important areas like Tackle, Corner and Safeties. then use RRE/RLE and SLCB and SUBLB to use whoever you want.

For you Lions boys whyb not do something like this? https://www.mut.gg/23/lineup-builder/b9fada89-e25f-4035-a464-58bdf4508b6c/

forzfedv6 said:

Nice team build, kinda what I am looking at going towards.  Does Stafford play better than Culpepper?  I have been using Culpepper and more of a run option offense, his trucking and BTK are pretty good.  https://www.mut.gg/23/lineup-builder/45cfcb2e-6a64-4eef-bedb-937d7bc59d76/

I use Stafford because of set feet lead and fearless, I didnt have that with Culpepper