anyone noticed how bad the markets are on old gen now?

xbox one and ps4 markets look like old pc markets.

84 headliners are sold out for some, kadarius toney going for like 60k on xbox one....

ps5 and xb sx has 50+ of everything.  i feel bad for people on old gen bc the new market split is awful for them

I switched from PS3 to PS4 during MUT 15 when there were separate markets.  I bought everything that was rare on PS4 before I converted over.  Percy Harvin was a ghost on PS4.  I bought 5 on PS3 and sold each for 10 million in less than 5 minutes 🤣🤣🤣.  Boss Peppers was selling for 10 million as well and I had 3 of those.

twitchtaxpro said:

xbox one and ps4 markets look like old pc markets.

84 headliners are sold out for some, kadarius toney going for like 60k on xbox one....

ps5 and xb sx has 50+ of everything.  i feel bad for people on old gen bc the new market split is awful for them

The market is fine on old gen... and the game play is far better.

Ducati0307 said:

The market is fine on old gen... and the game play is far better.

You're delusional if you actually think gameplay on old gen is better. Lmao

I haven't paid much attention to old gen market as I'm on current gen. But I wouldn't be surprised if this is true. Now both current and old gen platforms have players who are willing to spend money. I think current gen has more players willing to spend. Mostly, because most of the people who make money on playing mut are on current gen.

Comp players need to play current gen to compete in MCS. Additionally, I'm pretty sure most of the big content creators play on current gen as well. Both comp players and content creators are more likely to spend money on packs which means there's more items to be sold on the auction house.

Davensport said:

You're delusional if you actually think gameplay on old gen is better. Lmao

Sorry bruh... I'm not a casual.  I like being able to user to cover multiple routes and cover large portions of the field... and having a skill gap for experienced players.

Ducati0307 said:

Sorry bruh... I'm not a casual.  I like being able to user to cover multiple routes and cover large portions of the field... and having a skill gap for experienced players.

I’d argue you’re at least a bit of a casual if you refuse to move forward with the current iteration of the game on year 4

The Legends market on old gen is rough.

Ducati0307 said:

Sorry bruh... I'm not a casual.  I like being able to user to cover multiple routes and cover large portions of the field... and having a skill gap for experienced players.

I’m not trying to be toxic or anything, but you’re just wrong. Don‘t even try to argue. Next>Old

Ducati0307 said:

Sorry bruh... I'm not a casual.  I like being able to user to cover multiple routes and cover large portions of the field... and having a skill gap for experienced players.

So you like unrealistic gameplay??

Chugga said:

I’d argue you’re at least a bit of a casual if you refuse to move forward with the current iteration of the game on year 4

I'm sorry but the game is BORING on current gen.  Offense is far to easy.  Defense is nearly impossible against good players (or players with cheese schemes).  And I don't think it will get better as the year moves forward because I played a bunch of games on current gen at the end of M23 when everyone had 99 OVR teams.

GForce said:

I’m not trying to be toxic or anything, but you’re just wrong. Don‘t even try to argue. Next>Old

So make your case... convince me why current gen is "better".  I'll give you the counterpoint.

Literally the only thing better on current gen is that there is no FG block exploit.  But even that can be managed on old gen.

tresilk3 said:

So you like unrealistic gameplay??

I'm not a "sim" player.  The entire concept of MUT is unrealistic.

I just think there should be a significant skill gap between experienced players and casual/new players.  EA has  been shrinking that skill gap for years because it's better for business.  They will keep more players engaged and sell more packs if little Timmy, who gets the game for Christmas and plays it for a few weeks, can feel like he is competitive.  

The game on current gen is reflective of the tidal shift towards casualization of MUT... but it's not enjoyable for me.  To each his own.

Ducati0307 said:

So make your case... convince me why current gen is "better".  I'll give you the counterpoint.

Literally the only thing better on current gen is that there is no FG block exploit.  But even that can be managed on old gen.

The coverage requires more skill to user and make it so AIs lock up, running the ball requires more skill than human joystick all over the place, and skill passing which all make a larger skill gap which you said you like, not to mention also the better graphics, more FPS, momentum meter, fieldsense, better skeletons, faster load times, ect. What’s better on old gen than current gen? (I know the answer… it’s nothing)