Ive got it narrowed down to either Drake London or Taylor Decker based on needs. London would be a bigger slight upgrade over field pass 86 D-Hop for me (rest of my receivers are small fast guys) and WR is a "depth position" long term.
Decker looks really good and would replace 84 core elite Tunsil and everyone loves free OL because they dont like spending coins on it. 🤷♂️
Anyone have experience with either or any advice regardless? Thanks.
I would probably go with Taylor Decker. He will have more longevity on your team than Drake London.
Yeah I second decker. If London had higher speed it be closer but at 84 speed he's becoming outdated already there
Decker. You're fine with Nuk and Decker will most likely last longer on your lineup.
Thanks guys, i was already leaning decker slightly guess the unanimous decision seals it.
I went with Decker in my fantasy pack. Taking a BND offensive linemen is almost always the best option, especially when it's the best player at their position.
I tried 87 Drake London because I found him way cheaper than standard cost at the time and he was nothing special at all honestly. I ended up preferring the guys I had at the time anyway like Toney, OBJ. They were smooth and Drake felt really sluggish. Wouldn't say he made contested catches at a much higher rate either. Not a bad card but nothing special at all.
rule of thumb, ALWAYS go for the O Linemen and defensive linemen for your bnd packs unless there’s a must get baller, theme team player or personal favourite.
we don’t like spending 300k on linemen, but we’ll happily spend 300k on a new receiver or DB!
RyyoLurkedEm said:rule of thumb, ALWAYS go for the O Linemen and defensive linemen for your bnd packs unless there’s a must get baller, theme team player or personal favourite.
we don’t like spending 300k on linemen, but we’ll happily spend 300k on a new receiver or DB!
True lol
I would pick Taylor Decker, BND oline are invaluable and will last quite awhile on your team