EA logic is so bad

In a span of 1-2 weeks they dropped 4 QB’s for the pats 

95 Cam, 95 Bledsoe, 95 brady and for god knows what reason a 92 Mac, so many better options for the stocking stuffer and no OOP Marcus jones who’s scored in all 3 phases, shame

Agreed. They gave the Packers another CB/defensive player. I love Jaire, but we already have 95 Woodson, 94 Douglas, 94 Sanders, 93 Heyword, and a good 90 Stokes. Meanwhile, on the offensive side of the ball for the Packers, our best HB is an 89 Jones and the best receiver is a 92. If they were going to upgrade the Packers defensively, they should have upgraded Kenny Clark at DT. EA logic makes no sense.

Chargers got two 92 ovr LT’s and neither one get any secondary position so you can’t even move them to RT and keep the chem bonus lmao

the dev team troll the Panthers every single year. they finally add Cam Newton and they completely ruin the card with the abilities.

ZC Part 3 95 Champions: 3 of them a WR, DT and CB.

ZC Part 4 95 Champions: 3 of them a WR, DT and CB.

You couldn't make it up.

acomplixsituation said:

ZC Part 3 95 Champions: 3 of them a WR, DT and CB.

ZC Part 4 95 Champions: 3 of them a WR, DT and CB.

You couldn't make it up.

Those are important positions 😭

It feels as though the people at EA who make decisions about what cards to release are people who aren't football fans. They don't know the players or the wants of their customers (us). This website is a wonderful feedback source for them, with our comments and complaints. More importantly, it has a Theme Team section that shows the best players at each position for each team. Even if the EA decision makers weren't football experts, they could literally use that to see the needs at each position. It took me two minutes yesterday to go through all the teams and look at halfbacks to see only two teams have HBs with the best being an 89 or under: the Packers who have Aaron Jones at 89 and the Commanders with Antonio Gibson at 88. Give one of those teams then a 95 HB. Instead, they gave the Packers an unnecessary 95 CB when another team may need that upgrade even more. 

If EA is going to use Theme Teams, they need to be looking at the needs and wants more logically than they do. That's also why programs like Heavyweights, Veterans, Flashbacks, and Rising Stars are needed. Current players were upgraded on a much regular basis. Now, they are focusing on Legends and we're seeing the same cards over and over again.

Ugghhh!

Yup, they give so much love to the rams defense but not so much on offense, left side of the o-line is crap(highest is the 85 saffold LG, the 78 noteboom LT and 84 austin blythe TB C are the other two on that side) at least with the cooks ltd we finally got a 3rd receiver over 87(there were 4 at this ovr)……higbee needs an upgrade from his 89 team affinity card(hopefully he will get one after his xmas performance for TOTW when that return)

HEV said:

Chargers got two 92 ovr LT’s and neither one get any secondary position so you can’t even move them to RT and keep the chem bonus lmao

I mean shit I’d take it, best pats tackle  is 85 LT Trent brown who waa a pre order

The best dolphins o line man is tyreek Hill

Gotta love ea 🤦🏽‍♂️

acomplixsituation said:

ZC Part 3 95 Champions: 3 of them a WR, DT and CB.

ZC Part 4 95 Champions: 3 of them a WR, DT and CB.

You couldn't make it up.

Multiple WRs, DTs, and CBs from Zero Chill and Ghost Of Madden.... but how many pass rushers? This really is a massive joke