emmabearcat said:Charles Woodson has 90 man and 90 zone
Go back a few posts to see what he meant
emmabearcat said:Charles Woodson has 90 man and 90 zone
Go back a few posts to see what he meant
may buy him and play him at CB ngl. Woodson has been awful for me out wide he gets beat on the press a lot maybe due to his low accel. when he’s in the area he’s good. but that’s not my issue lol
Ball Hawk. You dont have to take him off the field.
Krause is only good for zone, he will get torched in man
RyyoLurkedEm said:may buy him and play him at CB ngl. Woodson has been awful for me out wide he gets beat on the press a lot maybe due to his low accel. when he’s in the area he’s good. but that’s not my issue lol
use woodson in the slot or at safety
RyyoLurkedEm said:i think you may be right. i have never noticed reeds height as an issue. dude was everywhere.
with how average corners are, i may just live in Big Nickel Over G and have budda, krause and reed out there at all times
Yea the man problem I had with Krause is the man coverage is a liability if you want to blitz. Basically forces you to have to have him be in Zone always, which limits you, same way that Sean Taylor does when you play him in the box and want to run man. They get crushed.
I say Reed. Better coverage for cover 0 and heavy blitzes. Depends on scheme
Original post moderated
if i wanted to do that i wouldn’t have posted. so your reply is negated
Original post moderated
no way you made an alt lmao
RyyoLurkedEm said:if i wanted to do that i wouldn’t have posted. so your reply is negated
Dont even bother, he's an alt lol
Original post moderated
and you’re joining in hahah, does that make you one of the other girls in the gossip circle?