Both positions have and will have crazy depth. Fitz looks heads and shoulders better than every WR except Crabtree. CMC is a touch faster than my current back Murray but those abilites on CMC are really nice. Unfortunately I like both players irl. What do you think?
mubby33
Posts: 635 |
930
MrAgentSochi
Posts: 12064 |
11.9K
Who are your current WRs?
kaotikords
Posts: 10298 |
5,551
Fitz will last you longer than CMC will (3/4 wr on most plays, so youll have a lot of depth and probably will only get maybe 1 or 2 wr for Halloween vs another of similar backs) (unless you use another rec rb then you could use CMC for awhile, even on just like screens/short passes)
Last edited by
kaotikords
- ,
edited 2 times in
total.
mubby33
Posts: 635 |
930
MrAgentSochi said:Who are your current WRs?
Lamb, Julio and Waddle. Waddle has been solid in the slot. My WR2 is more of an intermediate route guy so Lamb or Juilo will work fine keeping one of those. My intention a couple weeks ago was to add Moss but then we got Crabtree and Fitz, so Moss really is no longer an option I am considering.
kaotikords
Posts: 10298 |
5,551
Yeah Id go with Fitz for sure...
Fitz on the outside, you can pick either Lamb/Julio middle. Waddle slot, then your 2nd wr you didnt pick goes 4.
MrAgentSochi
Posts: 12064 |
11.9K
mubby33 said:Lamb, Julio and Waddle. Waddle has been solid in the slot. My WR2 is more of an intermediate route guy so Lamb or Juilo will work fine keeping one of those. My intention a couple weeks ago was to add Moss but then we got Crabtree and Fitz, so Moss really is no longer an option I am considering.
Then I would get Fitz. Murray is still one of the best HBs in the game even though he's not Saquon, CMC, Bettis, or WIlliams. Lamb and Julio are not a could be easily replaced by Fitz. And as kaoti said Fitz will last longer for you than CMC unless you use another receiving back.
Log in to join the conversation