James Cook or Pacheco?

Last Post
Posts: 301 |
315
#1

If you’ve used both. I need one for the theme team.

Reply with quote Send DM Report
Posts: 779 |
1,595
#2

I've seen more pros use Pacheco.

Reply with quote Send DM Report
Posts: 341 |
940
#3

CCCCCCCCCCCCCOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKK

Reply with quote Send DM Report
Posts: 341 |
940
#4

i'd reccomend cok

Reply with quote Send DM Report
Posts: 454 |
1
#5

I haven’t used Pacheco but cook was terrible for me

Reply with quote Send DM Report
Posts: 301 |
315
#6

Thanks for all the replies

Reply with quote Send DM Report
Posts: 579 |
6,475
#7

Pacheco

Reply with quote Send DM Report
Posts: 63 |
53
#8

pacheco. pacheco abilities rly nice

Reply with quote Send DM Report
Posts: 441 |
1,015
#9

I've used both and Pacheco plays better.

Reply with quote Send DM Report
Posts: 4137 |
7,023
#10

I thought both were pretty bad. I would put one as my 3rd string and uses someone else as your main HB. I have Pacheco as my #3 HB for the playoff chem but I run with CJ2K and Gurley. I also have ZC Henry in my lineup as a Power HB specialist . I run with those 3 over Pacheco, I just use him for chems

Reply with quote Send DM Report
Posts: 124 |
894
#11

Same, Pacheco seemed more balanced for me, closest to Ghost Henry

Reply with quote Send DM Report
Posts: 301 |
315
#12
Martyr1968 said:

I thought both were pretty bad. I would put one as my 3rd string and uses someone else as your main HB. I have Pacheco as my #3 HB for the playoff chem but I run with CJ2K and Gurley. I also have ZC Henry in my lineup as a Power HB specialist . I run with those 3 over Pacheco, I just use him for chems

I’m 60/60 playoff chems so doesn’t really make sense to choose a different back other than Pacheco or cook

Reply with quote Send DM Report
Log in to join the conversation