Justin Fields

Anyone tried the new Justin Fields CB in a man blitz scheme ¿ Might as well ask for Patrick Peterson opinions too

I would have loved to chose him at level 16 as reported but nope

nymets945 said:

I would have loved to chose him at level 16 as reported but nope

I tried him yesterday (J Fields CB)

He is good

Worth every coin that he is going for

Even better if you got him for free

That 6’3 height

Caramelo said:

I tried him yesterday (J Fields CB)

He is good

Worth every coin that he is going for

Even better if you got him for free

That 6’3 height

As good as Tariq Woolen?

Caramelo said:

I tried him yesterday (J Fields CB)

He is good

Worth every coin that he is going for

Even better if you got him for free

That 6’3 height

Have you tried any match coverages with him? I have been mixing in match coverage every now and then,  but I've found low play rec guys like Sauce Gardner's new card struggle in match. I didn't know if CB Fields would be similar due to having low play rec as well.

MrAgentSochi said:

As good as Tariq Woolen?

I played J Fields at SS in a man scheme 
 

I had Bam Bam Kam over there w 1 AP Enforcer and the hit sticks were not causing fumbles and that’s why I sold him for J Fields and for a coin perspective J Fields is more worth it 

I do think Woolen is better than J Fields at CB. I didn’t try Fields at CB because Woolen looks better in stats plus he has 1 inch over him. I don’t think that 90 press is going to be a game changer because if you don’t run abilities for corners they get torched sometimes. And Woolen better speed

If Woolen had inside shade I think he would have been the best CB in MUT at least for a man scheme

mbacon14 said:

Have you tried any match coverages with him? I have been mixing in match coverage every now and then,  but I've found low play rec guys like Sauce Gardner's new card struggle in match. I didn't know if CB Fields would be similar due to having low play rec as well.

I play him at SS in man scheme but the play rec is not a big thing. I had Charles Woodson and he was lost on the field while I had him in zone match sometimes 

He was getting beat by a vert corner combo and he is the best CB in MUT (stats) 

I was playing J Fields in purple zone but without match because when I used matched against a C route (the WR had a man on him too) the WR just blew past Charles Woodson and Bam Bam Kam in a purple match zone (when I had these players in my lineup)

mbacon14 said:

Have you tried any match coverages with him? I have been mixing in match coverage every now and then,  but I've found low play rec guys like Sauce Gardner's new card struggle in match. I didn't know if CB Fields would be similar due to having low play rec as well.

Zone match defense is really 50/50 sometimes they play the match well if you move them before the snap sometimes they don’t play their zone match well

I think a man zone scheme is better maybe you should try it out. Mix in the blitz with the zones and run inside shades in you want a 90% lockdown for the corners

Charles Woodson didn’t play well for me in man and I got Lester Hayes instead of him  just because of the inside shade and he played a lot better than Charles Woodson

Caramelo said:

Zone match defense is really 50/50 sometimes they play the match well if you move them before the snap sometimes they don’t play their zone match well

I think a man zone scheme is better maybe you should try it out. Mix in the blitz with the zones and run inside shades in you want a 90% lockdown for the corners

Charles Woodson didn’t play well for me in man and I got Lester Hayes instead of him  just because of the inside shade and he played a lot better than Charles Woodson

Did you try McAlister or Champ? Both have played really well for me.

Martyr1968 said:

Did you try McAlister or Champ? Both have played really well for me.

Nope,I did not

Caramelo said:

Nope,I did not

They're playmakers, and are pretty good in run support if you're interested. I have Those 2, NTL, Woodson, Hayes

Hello

Imo he’s good and forget about that 76 jump attribute it almost doesn’t matter

Martyr1968 said:

They're playmakers, and are pretty good in run support if you're interested. I have Those 2, NTL, Woodson, Hayes

Maybe I will try them out but I didn’t wanna spend the coins of them because of their height 

I’m playing Woolen Night Train and Hayes at corners and Gardner SS and J Fields FS 

I just realized that the whole time I was telling that I play J Fields at SS

Hippo5 said:

Hello

Imo he’s good and forget about that 76 jump attribute it almost doesn’t matter

I think if you play him at CB he gets smoked 

I am playing him at FS and I got no complains so far