Kittle or Pitts?

Trying to add a new #1 TE to go with Kelce and Gronk.

Looks like Kittle has the edge in most categories except Speed, which Pitts has a +2 in.  I do run a decent amount, so I value the higher RB with Kittle, but that speed is always enticing!  Anyone who has used both care to weigh in?

Thanks

Charmingjmor said:

Trying to add a new #1 TE to go with Kelce and Gronk.

Looks like Kittle has the edge in most categories except Speed, which Pitts has a +2 in.  I do run a decent amount, so I value the higher RB with Kittle, but that speed is always enticing!  Anyone who has used both care to weigh in?

Thanks

If you Have the coins get both.  Kittle at TE and Pitts at WR.  Not sure who you are running at WR, but Pitts has been great for me there.  He is my WR 2 with MF Chase as my WR 1.

RonaldDobbs said:

If you Have the coins get both.  Kittle at TE and Pitts at WR.  Not sure who you are running at WR, but Pitts has been great for me there.  He is my WR 2 with MF Chase as my WR 1.

I have 91 Moss(25 Pats), 91 Chase, 89 Pickens, 88 JuJu, I don’t really want to use the coins on 2 more TEs because I’m saving for Talib(I have 4 87s in my binder, so I could make one of them fairly inexpensively).

I like that Pitts is fast and can be put at WR also, but I really like the RB combo of Kittle:Gronk, since I have Peterson and my offense starts with the run and I pass from there, usually short routes.  Quite the dilemma.

I'd go for Pitts he can be a good vertical threat if he your opponent is focusing on stopping the run. But it sounds like Kittle might be a better fit for your scheme with his blocking

Parham is a good mix of both.

ptp4life24 said:

Parham is a good mix of both.

I agree with this, I have all 3 but Parham and Pitts are a notch above Kittle .

You all convinced me, I went with Pitts

Pitts

Charmingjmor said:

Trying to add a new #1 TE to go with Kelce and Gronk.

Looks like Kittle has the edge in most categories except Speed, which Pitts has a +2 in.  I do run a decent amount, so I value the higher RB with Kittle, but that speed is always enticing!  Anyone who has used both care to weigh in?

Thanks

I have basically zero coins, yet somehow managed to acquire both Kittle and Pitts.  Honestly, if you can only choose one, I'd say Pitts -- and that is coming from a decidedly biased, lifelong 49er fanatic.  I'm running 30/50 Niner TT, have Kittle as TE1, with Kelce and then Pitts is my WR1, next to Randy and GOAT.  Using Vanguard on Kittle (x3, 10 yard passes) and Route Tech (x2, 20 yard passes) on Pitts.

DK Metcalf probably best option (although i've not used him), then Pitts is a close second from that program for pass catchers.  Kittle is great, but i don't think it's a question, Pitts clearly superior.

def Pitts w that SPD

Pitts > Parham > Kittle

Pitts is ridiculous for me.  I'm not someone who's very calm while playing H2H and he had like 150 yards and multiple TDs for me the other day.  I believe it was my first game with him.

I have 83 overall pitts who is a budget beast

William13 said:

I have 83 overall pitts who is a budget beast

He was good for me when I had him at the beginning of the year. Pitts cards tend to play well (for me at least).