Lurker vs Acrobat on Non-User Sub-LB?

Last Post

Lurker vs Acrobat on Non-User Sub-LB?

Lurker Non-User Sub-LB
29.4%
Acrobat Non-User Sub-LB
70.6%
Total votes: 17
Posts: 976 |
3,005
#1

On Kam (not usering) I can have Acrobat or Lurker.  I play mostly zone on PS4.  Which route would you take?

Reply with quote Send DM Report
Posts: 236 |
99
#2

acrobat for sure but lurker is really good only for users

Reply with quote Send DM Report
Posts: 976 |
3,005
#3
DMoney said:

acrobat for sure but lurker is really good only for users

Thanks DMoney.

Reply with quote Send DM Report
Posts: 1819 |
38
#4
DMoney said:

acrobat for sure but lurker is really good only for users

This

Reply with quote Send DM Report
Posts: 860 |
0
#5

Acrobat activates all game for me.Lurker not so much.

Reply with quote Send DM Report
Posts: 1256 |
295
#6

Based on what I know, lurker is always good on your users, especially LB ones, but acrobat is way better on non users. Also if you have the AP I run Mid-Zone KO on my second sub-lb and I like it a lot especially with them playing in the middle and seeing the field a lot.

Last edited by SebSeb88 - , edited 1 time in total.
Reply with quote Send DM Report
Posts: 10298 |
5,551
#7

Acrobat for cbs

Lurker for lb (if youre using a SS for sub lb, you dont need lurker)

Reply with quote Send DM Report
Posts: 12064 |
11.9K
#8

Acrobat on non users.

Lurker on users.

Reply with quote Send DM Report
Log in to join the conversation