tom264ebm said:
Even if dailies stay boosted(unlikely) hes counting milestones refreshing that dont have a two week timer(no timer) and where the 100 solo wins are so how could it refresh. Who knows.
Ahawkalypse
Posts: 215 |
450
colbyzg
Posts: 937 |
2,075
xXcGilmer18Xx said:I stand corrected, you just literally have to log in and play solo battles basically everyday.
That sounds like a living hell. Different strokes…
MrWhistler
Posts: 52 |
135
If I’m not mistaken the weekly challenges carry over so you have 6 weeks to win the 20 games or 100 solo battles
SquishySoldier21
Posts: 1365 |
2,935
MrWhistler said:If I’m not mistaken the weekly challenges carry over so you have 6 weeks to win the 20 games or 100 solo battles
Even if that were true that's still not realistic for alot of people. They constantly are taking down solos for no good reason and even when working you can only play up to four a day. And as for the MUT wins, youd need to average just under four wins a week, more than alot of people can manage even if they wanted the sweatfest, especially with a 25 game per week limit allowed.
moose374
Posts: 19 |
18
nymets945 said:They really cut down on the objectives which are reasonable this pass
They also made them that much more difficult for mutchamps. 20 wins… Jesus.
Terryfying
Posts: 183 |
235
tom264ebm said:exactly, but to be honest, most of us already do that...
I doubt that. A lot of us can't stand playing against the computer. So boring.
tom264ebm
Posts: 215 |
1,682
Terryfying said:I doubt that. A lot of us can't stand playing against the computer. So boring.
and the other half dont want to play against toxic humans...
Terryfying
Posts: 183 |
235
SquishySoldier21 said:Even if that were true that's still not realistic for alot of people. They constantly are taking down solos for no good reason and even when working you can only play up to four a day. And as for the MUT wins, youd need to average just under four wins a week, more than alot of people can manage even if they wanted the sweatfest, especially with a 25 game per week limit allowed.
The objective is for a week dawg. Not 20 Champs wins for the whole comp pass lol.
Terryfying
Posts: 183 |
235
MrWhistler said:If I’m not mistaken the weekly challenges carry over so you have 6 weeks to win the 20 games or 100 solo battles
The whole point of weeklies is to do them in a week.
Edit: what you said is true for the season pass and other program passes that get added objectives in following weeks. But the objectives reset on comp.
Last edited by
Terryfying
- ,
edited 1
time in total.
Terryfying
Posts: 183 |
235
Luckily for all of you the rewards aren't even worth grinding. Winning games on regular seasons is more profitable.
TwoMinutHalf
Posts: 10 |
165
xXcGilmer18Xx said:Between the “win 20 games” and “win 100 solo battles”, EA has made me not even wanna play the game just because of unachievable objectives.. I can get the 20 games in WL, a grind, but the 100 solo battles will never happen.. A) I don’t have time, B) I expect solo battles to break like they did the last 2 weeks of last season.. this is a bit ridiculous.
Oh yea no way I'm winning 20 I suck too bad. I wish they kept it like season 2.
SquishySoldier21
Posts: 1365 |
2,935
Terryfying said:The objective is for a week dawg. Not 20 Champs wins for the whole comp pass lol.
Thats what I thought at first too, but took his word for it. Lol thats even worse. 20 wins out of 25 games. In a week. Thats a tiny percentage of people.
Terryfying
Posts: 183 |
235
SquishySoldier21 said:Thats what I thought at first too, but took his word for it. Lol thats even worse. 20 wins out of 25 games. In a week. Thats a tiny percentage of people.
I mean luckily you can still get plenty of comp pass xp without doing that. It's just to reward the super sweaty guys who want to max out the pass the fastest or who want to avoid playing solos as much as possible.
People act like EA is trying to attack them personally with these objectives. Not every reward in a competitive multiplayer game should be accessible to every single player. I probably top out at around 15 wins. But I'm not gonna sit there and get salty because I missed out on a tiny bit of xp.
Personally I think there should be a more defined ranked experience that states the ELO or the MMR of each player going into it... With specific rewards for hitting milestones during each season and a soft reset at the end of the season. That's what Champs should be to me. But you know people would be salty about that too. Everyone just wants handouts. TBH this comp pass is ass. I think the level 29 reward is a fuckin MIDFIELD pack lol. I'm not pressed. I'll take whatever XP I get incidentally and keep it pushing.
Edit: I'm not defending EA by any means. I think the objectives are fine, but the rewards are horrendous. Most of the packs won't even be relevant to truly competitive players by the time we get them. Shit, some of them are already outdated... especially being BND. like what's the point? Lol
Last edited by
Terryfying
- ,
edited 2 times in
total.
TBone75
Posts: 1193 |
1,450
Terryfying said:I doubt that. A lot of us can't stand playing against the computer. So boring.
I'd rather earn rewards from slow ass Comp games than play against the cheesers. that shit gets old damn quick
Last edited by
TBone75
- ,
edited 1
time in total.
Terryfying
Posts: 183 |
235
TBone75 said:I'd rather earn rewards from slow ass Comp games than play against the cheesers. that shit gets old damn quick
The amount of times I've gone against players that I completely shutdown vs the amount of times I've gone against guys who I couldn't figure out how to stop at all is heavily skewed toward the former.
It's way better than PA Shot Seams from last year. That was a legit struggle. Most of these guys now wanna throw the same exact routes over and over. I've been getting a LOT of lurks this year.
Log in to join the conversation