Opinion - would you sit a TT card for a better non-TT card?

Posts: 3684 |

9,168

For me at 50/50, I still have decent fillers of Collin Johnson, Jalen Ramsey, and Poweruped up minus the 98 Team Diamond Luke Kuechley.

I run the best of the best that I can to make sure I have 50/50, then those positions that have 4-5 spots like DT, MLB, CB and WR, are mostly my filler slots.

Last edited by Busta - , edited 1 time in total.

Posts: 1819 |

#17

Yeah

Posts: 260 |

#18

WernersBerner said:

I mean when I ran my saints TT for a while I used Mike T over Kupp even though I could afford him. I’d go Odell, Toney, and Moss. Claypool or Kupp as WR4 is your choice but Claypool is bigger bodied so I’d go with him. I think it’s more fun to use your actual TT players which is why usually when I pick a theme team to do I pick one with players I know I’m going to use whether they are the best or not, but that’s really your decision since it’s your team, but in my opinion Kupp is the odd man out. He doesn’t fit the TT and isnt the best non-TT receiver out of your options (Him, Moss, Claypool).

this ^

Posts: 473 |

1,055

#19

I play a 50/50 TT but have plenty of starter gaps so I think you can mostly do both? A Raiders player goes in every slot where it is possible for me though and I wouldn't lose 50/50 to take on a 'better' player.

Last edited by EightyOne - , edited 1 time in total.

Posts: 308 |

#20

I would just start by going all in on the TT.

As you can see there isnt many ares you would need to cheat on. This is how I would mess around with non TT positions ------> cheat TT

Last edited by paradoxity4078 - , edited 1 time in total.