like a 3 on offense but a 7 on defense
9.8 out of 10 almost never lose games and have won about 200 superbowls so far this year i have a amazing user and know almost every play in every formation know all the defensive coverages and know how to pick them apart. The games i lose the most is when i get kicked out
CommanderWolffe said:obviously not if you're a packers fan... just kidding of course
😂
I’d say im a 7/10 im good but i make too many mistakes especially when its a shootout and i get a chip on my shoulder and then throw a INT that could cost me to lose by 7 or 3 and i dont use meta plays
Good enough to not regurgitate the meta or rely on the overpowered Steroid Ability Man Coverage. I good off and still win majority of my games.
8.
i’m a 20 win Mut Champs & Top 100 WL player
i’ve beaten pros, like Pihcam
i’ve kept games close verse KMac & Mayz, Rag6 (loosing cause of my mistakes, picks and fumble scrambling)
i’ve beaten youtubers like DMoney, CC, & The director. (on CC’s second channel is my game verse him. not my best game due to being forced to play dollar)
but when i play Joker Cale, i just get smashed. The MCS guys are built different.
I think it’s hard to rate myself but I would guess I’m probably like a solid 6. I’m much better on defense than offense. I win more games than I lose and when I lose it’s rarely a blowout.
I don’t watch YouTube or MCS so I don’t really know who the pros are. I have matched up with top 100 players many times though and come away with some wins.
SlowAndSteady said:I think it’s hard to rate myself but I would guess I’m probably like a solid 6. I’m much better on defense than offense. I win more games than I lose and when I lose it’s rarely a blowout.
I don’t watch YouTube or MCS so I don’t really know who the pros are. I have matched up with top 100 players many times though and come away with some wins.
You're probably higher than a 6, my friend!
I don't play H2H anymore. so I'd rate myself 6.5
EightyOne said:6ish?
I win a lot of games but will not run cheese on either side of the ball and have never even looked at a YouTube video to get 'better'. Spamming stuff that breaks the AI isn't being 'good' anyway - it's cheating.
So I get beat about 40% of the time. I don't spend money and run a TT with a few rules that stop it from being as good as it could be (93 Jimmy G for example) but I'm cool with that. I'd rather play fair and lose basically.
a True Raiders TT I love it. no fillers
A 6 out of 10. On a good day a 7.
TBone75 said:a True Raiders TT I love it. no fillers
https://www.mut.gg/23/lineup-builder/0863340a-daed-4720-aa30-d7b4efe0ad16/
Not sure it's a "True" TT but I've done the best I could so far. I'll get Jacobs and Andre James eventually and probably go Zay Jones or Amari Cooper outside WR with Myers in the slot. I'm NMS though, so it'll take a while. My rules are that I have no duplicate numbers and no Legends and I won't have any AKA players because of the stupid names on the shirts. Where it's just not realistic to have a Raiders player (we have no one at LOLB at all and our OLine cards are hopeless) I've got no choice but to look outside of Raiders Chems and I figure I could have FA and Draft players within reason (no Lamaar because he's never leaving the Raven IRL and we don't have the Cap anyway) but none of those BS All-Chem players.
It's hard work man :o)