So you’re taking me Green Bay goes 8-9 and their TT is a 93, Detroit goes 9-8 and they gave a 90. 3 ovr difference when the worst team gets  better players? This company is so terrible its laughable
Do we really have nothing better rant about lmao
MrAgentSochi said:Do we really have nothing better rant about lmao
It's a serious issue.
MrAgentSochi said:Do we really have nothing better rant about lmao
Nope. The game is perfect
TreyReichert4 said:So you’re taking me Green Bay goes 8-9 and their TT is a 93, Detroit goes 9-8 and they gave a 90. 3 ovr difference when the worst team gets  better players? This company is so terrible its laughable
Because it’s fantasy and gb sells more cards than a lions tt
Excellent use of your initial time here.
Let's just ignore the fact that a lot of TTs feature players which - shock horror! - had NOTHING AT ALL TO DO with the season just gone, and also that MUT as a whole is a game mode that has always favoured fantasy over reality.
TreyReichert4 said:So you’re taking me Green Bay goes 8-9 and their TT is a 93, Detroit goes 9-8 and they gave a 90. 3 ovr difference when the worst team gets  better players? This company is so terrible its laughable
Green Bay has a better history of winning. That means better players and more historic players.Â
It's difficult to pick theme teams of historically bad teams that haven't had runs in recent years. Teams like the Lions, Browns, and Jets have had too many lean years.Â
On the other hand. Teams like the Raiders, Cowboys, and 49'ers have had multiple historic runs and great players.Â
Then you have the teams like the Patriots that have decent players but never really have top tier teams that match what they do on the field.Â
When I pick a team I try to figure out how good that team will be in the upcoming season and then what kind of history they have so I have an idea what kind of cards they'll get throughout the game.