Parham or Pitts?

Last Post
Posts: 2546 |
8,287
#1

Pulled BND Parham, already have kyle pitts. both have 90 speed as i have 25/50 MF chem

coins aren’t an issue, can be fine with Parham at TE 2 and keep pitts, just based on stats though who’s better?

Last edited by RyyoLurkedEm - , edited 2 times in total.
Reply with quote Send DM Report
Posts: 1138 |
1,960
#2

walker? Waller is 86 SPD TE... Waller is solid, but Pitts is fastest TE in game, have Waller at TE1 since run Ravens chems and like the way he plays better than Sharpe and Higbee (25 Ravens / 25 Rams)

Last edited by StoicTrader - , edited 1 time in total.
Reply with quote Send DM Report
Posts: 2546 |
8,287
#3
StoicTrader said:

walker? Waller is 86 SPD TE... Waller is solid, but Pitts is fastest TE in game, have Waller at TE1 since run Ravens chems and like the way he plays better than Sharpe and Higbee (25 Ravens / 25 Rams)

Parham**** slow brain today lol

Reply with quote Send DM Report
Posts: 1138 |
1,960
#4

haha gotcha, whenever it's close and they both fit for me I keep the BND and sell the other player to get coins back, probably what I would do, used Pitts for a little then sold him back but yeah

Reply with quote Send DM Report
Posts: 4258 |
765
#5

Pitts is always a problem out there when i play against him

Reply with quote Send DM Report
Posts: 307 |
2,085
#6

Pitts, unstoppable route tech

PleaseAndThankYou

Reply with quote Send DM Report
Posts: 1734 |
1,076
#7

I'd get Pitts.  He's been fantastic for me.

Reply with quote Send DM Report
Posts: 243 |
1,105
#8

Move Pitts to Wr depending who you have

Reply with quote Send DM Report
Posts: 4125 |
6,923
#9

I got em both and Parham gets animations and post catch broken tackles that Pitts doesn't.

Pitts is more like a WR than a TE. I was using him at WR  before OBJ & JaMarr came out. No one is replacing DK for me though. Not yet anyway. His card is just built differently

Don't get me wrong, Pitts is great and I still use him along w Parham and MF Kittle but IMO Parham is better...and if you run MF chem 25/50 you get +1 speed on him

Last edited by Martyr1968 - , edited 1 time in total.
Reply with quote Send DM Report
Posts: 1378 |
5
#10

We kinda got a trail run with the free Parham a couple of days ago and I wasn't the biggest fan compared to how good Pitts has been for me. He felt kind of clunky on routes especially underneath and didn't juke as well despite being under the 245 weight threshold. Might just be his player model is a lot thicker than Pitts even though they similar weights and only a couple inches different in height. 

I prefer Pitts as my full time TE but if you have the coins Parham in the redzone and then moving Pitts out wide is really good.

Reply with quote Send DM Report
Posts: 183 |
2,227
#11

Pitts better for underneath and zigs, Parham great on single coverage crossers and corners.

Reply with quote Send DM Report
Log in to join the conversation