Sooo..
I have the following:
Metcalf
K. Allen
T Hill
Randy Moss (89)
TE:
Pitts
Mayer
I'm 20K away from Kelce. Not sure how he plays. Debating on whether to sell one of the WR's and put Pitts as WR.
Sooo..
I have the following:
Metcalf
K. Allen
T Hill
Randy Moss (89)
TE:
Pitts
Mayer
I'm 20K away from Kelce. Not sure how he plays. Debating on whether to sell one of the WR's and put Pitts as WR.
Kelce doesn't play any different than any other top TE in the game honestly
SportsPerson94 said:Kelce doesn't play any different than any other top TE in the game honestly
I sold my Duke for the Kelce and he plays literally identical
Kharvn said:I sold my Duke for the Kelce and he plays literally identical
Yep lol. Most of these cards are similar with different names
I'm in the opposite boat. I need to purchase two WRs and 1 TE... not sure who to go with. Considering going with Kittle/Pitts + a WR or 2 WRs and Kittle OR Pitts.
I forgot to mention that I have a 87 BND Gronk. I should just put him in 3rd string for those TE/Block/Run like formations.
I definitely feel what you guys are saying as far as the similarities of the cards this year. I feel the same. Because of that there's a lot of decent WR's and TE's to pick from.
I guess it comes down to play style and chem for some. I'm going to play around with some different variations of my lineup and see what I like.
I'd play the following:
WR1: Metcalf
WR2: Pitts
WR3: Moss
WR4: Allen
TE1: Kelce
I am not sure if you're scheme is 1 or 2 TEs / 3 or 4 WRs but that's how I would keep it.
So far, Pitts at WR is unstoppable. Tyreek is good but he's short and those short animations just aren't it.
i'd definately keep hill/metcalf.........
for TE, gronk has literally been amazing for me, the best card I have used on offense by far, he catches everything & turns it into yardage.
Really abilities are going to be the only noticeable changes between those options. Go with the ones that have the abilities you'd use most.
Rollhumps said:I'm in the opposite boat. I need to purchase two WRs and 1 TE... not sure who to go with. Considering going with Kittle/Pitts + a WR or 2 WRs and Kittle OR Pitts.
if u got the coins, get D.K
best wr in the game imo.
i have unstoppable route tech on him and when he lights up, GG's...
WR1: Metcalf (haven’t used him but stats look good)
WR2: Moss (only going to get better)
WR3: Pitts (my scheme he doesn’t go deep so he’s amazing for light boxing the defense)
TE: Kelce
36Chambers said:Sooo..
I have the following:
Metcalf
K. Allen
T Hill
Randy Moss (89)
TE:
Pitts
Mayer
I'm 20K away from Kelce. Not sure how he plays. Debating on whether to sell one of the WR's and put Pitts as WR.
Kelce has been great for me.
Moss has been great for me.
Hill has been great for me.
There are so many freaking Tight Ends I would sell them. There are a couple Most Feared Tight Ends that aren't bad as well if you have to keep 87 BND Most Feared Players and do not have any other holes that need filled.
I have Kielce and Gronk and run a lot of two TE sets. Gronk is still great. Moss and Kupp. Kupp has been the most fun WR I’ve used in a long time. He gets open up to 20 yards constantly. His stats indicate that he shouldn’t work, but every year there are cards that play differently than their stats. This is one of them. And yes, I got him super cheap.
Droopy34 said:if u got the coins, get D.K
best wr in the game imo.
i have unstoppable route tech on him and when he lights up, GG's...
Facts. He is definitely the best. I've got Montana with HRM and GS and it's been a blast with all these receivers. Can't forget about my boy Franco either.