kaotikords's posts

ZayT31 said:

For real People be making fun of the Lamar QB but this one has boosted stats and should be cheaper than the LTD

No way in hell. Youre talking 330k vs 1m +

Depending on some other stats behind the card, Henry is probably number one. 

Lamar/Mahomes/Mixon may not be bad but just depends. If you want Lamar, itll be cheaper to get the SR one.

Pretty solid list besides Alstott

MrAgentSochi said:

Added my favorite GT, ED TOO TALL JONES WR!!!!

Meta incoming. Too saucey

Volcanic163 said:

I can't believe someone still made a Lamar Jackson GT. Such a waste. Could've been someone like the McCourty bros.

You always get dupes/close to 99s that get GT every year. At least we dont get the same player more than once anymore. That was super dumb.

You pull them in packs. 

Could be anywhere from 500k lowest to 10m highest weve seen in the past. 

Odds are 1m+ for the low end.

ggg34 said:

Wow!! As a Bears fan, it’s not bad, we get 5 GT 👍

I think thats the most Ive seen so far!

phaub1 said:

gt with only 96 zone and man

After 90 its not like its percentile increases...

About 13 W and the rest L or just average/will get something better there

Maybe about 13 Ws on there. Lots of L but they got to make who they wanted

Some 89

xqpopo said:

yeah but its not worth buying for over a mill cuz in a couple weeks time the market will be completely dead

I agree but people will have coins to blow. 

Usually the lowest of the low is 500-700k

Baresi2007 said:

New  to MUT so I had a couple questions about the golden ticket players. First is any idea ballpark what they’ll sell for? I’m assuming you pull from packs just like any other promo. Also, do the cards get team chems for all teams played for like a power up? Thanks!

Probably 1m+ on the low end... Better/meta probably 3-5m unless TVP comes out

No power ups but they should get all teams they played for

They are in the cards prelaunch. They dont change through the year.

lmao I got 5 right. I just copied an up to date mock draft a day before.